LOL.... LOL ....LOL ....
At least one person is seeing thru the fog of spin and deception put up by
Lomax. My job is done and is an unqualified success.
Jojo
PS. I have proven both statements to be true. A'isha was indeed a little
girl BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS as evidenced by her preoccupation with dolls.
Which adult woman who is emotionally mature would bring dolls to her
"wedding". Of course, Lomax spins this saying that this is just like a
Doll collector bringing dolls to her new home. But, honest and objective
people know that that is not the case. She brought her dolls because she
was still playing with it.
Second, Lomax have proven it to everybody that muslims do indeed approve of
sexual relations with a 9 year old. This is shocking to me cause I truly
expected Lomax (being a moderate westernized muslim), to oppose and condemn
muhammed's retrograde action. Yet, to my shock and amazement, he actually
defended and tried to justify it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Veeder" <hveeder...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:List integrity
Sorry I am confused.
What is considered false here?
A nine year old is barely out diapers
or
that muslims do not disapprove of sexual relations with a nine year old?
Harry
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49 AM, de Bivort Lawrence
<ldebiv...@gmail.com> wrote:
That a statement is endlessly repeated does not make it true.
I posted at length on the family practices of the Arabian peninsula, as
they pertained to Christian, Jewish, and pantheistic communities, and to
the pre-revelatory emergence of Islam, which limited some of the
practices that many people today criticize.
But Jojo seems not to have seen this posting, though he did say he would
respond to it (and this I hope from his own knowledge rather than
assertian-based pseudo-sources), for he repeats assertions that are shown
in the posting to be flat-out incorrect.
On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:16 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
<a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote:
At 10:37 PM 12/30/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
Hence, in you, the corruption of islam is seen by everyone. The same
corruption that justifies to the world that it is OK to fondle a 9
year old
little girl BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS, just because other people are doing
it.
No matter how you justify it, that's CREEPY.
BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS.
What is
obviously false does not become more true by being repeated over and
over.
Jojo actually acknowledged that this one was false, but has continued
to
emphasize it.
Jojo is using hyperbole so calling it false is an ineffective repsonse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole
Harry
