While this is not cold fusion, I had an opportunity to video a new
energy lab, and took it.
I will continue to create portraits of new energy researchers, if it
comes my way.
I see cold fusion as the most probable breakthrough for the near future,
but the Papp engine may not be far behind, and is a technology that
could operate alongside it.
This is the sixth movie I have made this year, all by my lonesome since
my cameraman/editor left me to pursue more lucrative endeavors. I'm
getting better with each edit, with the goal of entertaining and
educating. As a Clean Energy Advocate, I do not grill or snake
scientists. I am not a detective (not yet anyway). I ask, they
answer. I am grateful for all the help I continue to get in learning to
ask the right questions.
Cold Fusion Now wants to remain positive, and rated G for the kids! I
want to show the kids, the students, and those who are looking for
inspiration: What does a new energy lab look like? How do researchers in
this field operate? What kind of research is going on? What kind of
energy solutions are being pursued and, what is the level of development?
This video shows one team's engines in development, an explanation of
its operational principles, however incomplete, in their own words, and
what they plan to do next. It has a light-science background for the
general public.
While the video does not appear to show over-unity by examining the
speed of the piston, I would not dismiss this whole technology through
Youtube analysis. I am convinced by what I've read that Joseph Papp had
something going on. Now, a handful of teams are trying to reproduce it.
For all our sake, I only hope they succeed.
Please direct your technical questions about the Pulser to Heinz
Klostermann at heinri...@me.com.
Pseudo-skeptics have held the power of position, but now they are
irrelevant - irrelevant I say!
Maybe I don't have the right to say that, but the fact is, the noisy din
of useless information does not carry their protestations far, nor does
their message have penetration or "staying power", as they did
pre-Internet.
Yes, the after-image of their sad, destructive paradigm still prevents
the MSM from reporting on the developments in cold fusion and new
energy; legislators and policy-makers are woefully uninformed and do not
fund this research; pseudo-skeptics have chosen to be die-hards, and
they will, as all old paradigms do.
We are building a new house, so when the old one collapses, it'll be
ready to move in!
After a short break over the next couple weeks, 2013 projects for Cold
Fusion Now include:
* more cold fusion video interviews as dictated by my geographic
location on the west coast,
* a possible mini-conference in Los Angeles,
* activist visits to schools and colleges in the So Cal area (Caltech
look out!),
* attendance at ICCF-18 to conduct one-on-one interviews,
* putting next year's 2014 History of Cold Fusion Calendar together
with a an awesome new theme (not tellin yet!) but it's really cool.
You can help support my efforts by purchasing a Calendar here:
http://coldfusionnow.org/store/2013-history-of-cold-fusion-calendar/
Thank you for all the feedback.
Your comments help to make my art more communicative.
Happy New Year!
Ruby
On 1/1/13 7:20 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Interesting video, but frustrating.
Klostermann seems like a sweet old guy who is having fun working with
the Papp concept. He's done all kinds of things, but the type of
cannon he has built, and that we saw firing so many times, could
easily be arranged so that energy output is measured.
He's planing on using a government design for an electric generator,
and predicts power output, etc., yet he's not done the most basic
measurement, and he acknowledges that, but he seems to imply that it
would be expensive.
No, it would be about as easy as what he's already done, in fact,
easier. The output of his cannon is the kinetic energy of the
projectile, and that is easily measured. If the kinetic energy of the
projectile is as we would expect, less than the energy dumped into the
cannon by the ionizatin sources, then neither would a generator work
to generate excess power. Yes, it would generate power, but less than
the electrical power used to operate it.
Ruby asked him the question, he didn't answer it. She's very polite
and did not push him. Looks like she's having fun.
"Marshall Plan" to support this is not going to happen unless someone
shows over unity, convincingly.
I recommend that Cold Fusion Now stay away from these very shaky
Alternative Energy claims, and stick to LENR. That's where political
support could be useful and effective.
Otherwise pseudoskeptics, faced with some actual possible
breakthrough, politically, will use support for something ilke the
Papp engine to attack the credibility of the organization.
At 12:39 PM 12/31/2012, Ruby wrote:
video: PULSER Plasma Engine Core: Recovering the Papp engine
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNSAXbZfnbE>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNSAXbZfnbE
post: Heinz Klostermann on the Papp engine: "There should be a
Marshall Plan to support this"
http://coldfusionnow.org/heinz-klostermann-on-the-papp-engine-there-should-be-a-marshall-plan-to-support-this/
--
Ruby Carat
r...@coldfusionnow.org <mailto:r...@coldfusionnow.org>
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org <http://www.coldfusionnow.org>
