Plasmoid sounds as goofy as a gremlin...
How about WIPE:
weakly interacting particle energetic
If they are massive like an orbiting hurricane particle we will call them
WIPE OUT
On Monday, December 31, 2012, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> Like other areas of LENR, the strength of the reaction is based on the
> details of the design.
> I the Papp reaction, the strength of the plasmoid can be relatively small
> when produced in air, but stronger when more reactive electronegative
> gases are used in the reaction.
>
> In keeping with other LENR terminology, one can call plasmoids produced in
> air a Papp reaction plasmoid.
>
> A plasmoid developed in helium as a Papp+ plasmoid reaction and a plasmoid
> developed in a noble gas mix together with chlorine and water vapor as a
> Papp++ reaction.
>
> These reactions differ in strength in ascending order based on the exact
> chemistry and proportionality of the electronegative gas mix.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers: axil
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Eric Walker
> <eric.wal...@gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'eric.wal...@gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
>> <zeropo...@charter.net<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'zeropo...@charter.net');>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> RE: underlying physical mechanism in Papp’s device…****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Perhaps it’s as simple as the volume changes that occur in piezoceramics
>>> under an applied voltage… only that its occurring in a gas where individual
>>> atoms/molecules are free to orient completely with the applied E-field
>>> resulting in maximum displacement; unlike in condensed matter where the
>>> alignment, and thus displacement, is restricted due to chemical bonding…
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't be surprised if this is something mundane. If the mechanism
>> is known physics, as Heinz Klostermann says in Ruby's video, I do not
>> see how it would be overunity (unless one brings out the zero point field
>> or something similar).
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>
