I tried. Slate's server is down. On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Even more depressing. I am locked out of Slate, unable to respond to this > article. Maybe everyone is? > > Here is the response I was trying to post. If someone else could post it I > would appreciate it. > > > I have a collection of papers on cold fusion. It includes 1,200 peer-reviewed > papers from mainstream journals, copied from the library at Los Alamos, and > 2,000 others from conference proceedings and institutions such as EPRI, Los > Alamos, China Lake, Mitsubishi and the NSF. This literature proves beyond any > doubt that cold fusion is real. Here is a typical conclusion from the > literature: > > > > "EPRI PERSPECTIVE This work confirms the claims of Fleischmann, Pons, and > Hawkins of the production of excess heat in deuterium-loaded palladium > cathodes at levels too large for chemical transformation. However, the > phenomena were obtained in only about half the cells. From the conditions of > loading, initiation time, and current density on the successful observations > of excess heat, it is understood why the phenomena are so difficult to > attain." > > > > The effect was detected at over 200 major laboratories. According to a tally > published by the Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of > Sciences, it has been measured in roughly 14,000 positive tests. The signal > to noise ratio is sometimes high, for example with heat a 100 W with no input > power, or 10E18 atoms of tritium. > > >
