>From the link on Bill's page [1]: "The engine I have invented is far more efficient than any other steam engine because the efficiency of the magnetron in turning water into steam. In fact, the water droplet 'explodes' very much like air/gasoline explodes in a conventional internal combustion engine."
It sounds a little like Heinz Klostermann's reworked air-fueled popper [2]. Eric [1] http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/**magputt.txt<http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/magputt.txt> [2] http://coldfusionnow.org/heinz-klostermann-on-the-papp-engine-there-should-be-a-marshall-plan-to-support-this/ On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Alex's message of Sat, 12 Jan 2013 21:42:54 +0100: > Hi, > [snip] > >BUT what is the Conclusion in the end? > >Because I want to convert a internal combustion engine which uses petrol > >as fuel to use hydrogen. Well that is possible with a elecrolysis > >engine. But what about the steam generated by a magnetron? > > > >I dont want some fake answers, just answers which are correct. > > I doubt anyone on this list knows for sure. The short answer is try it and > see. > Let us know if it works. Hydrino formation would be one possible > explanation, > potentially with some nuclear reactions as a result of the Hydrino > formation. > If you build and run it, then also test for gamma-ray production (Geiger > counter). > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
