Hey Hamdi, Long time.

I am re-interested in a coil that you reported generating Ozone at low
voltages.

Can you give some more detail on that one please?

Thanks,
John

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Hamdi Ucar <u...@verisoft.com> wrote:

> Hello everybody remembering me,
>
> I had difficulty to join Vortex List by a possible reason of
> http://www.mail-archive.com is possibly being filtered here. Terry helped
> me.
>
> I would like to ask your opinions about suppression (trends) after 2000
> where global CO2 emissions is widely considered a serious issue. It
> appears that self-suppression is effective enough, so direct
> interventions are no longer needed :) I dont want also blame mainstream
> science for lack of interest as long as the they haven't the phenomenon
> in their hands.
>
> For example if you (inventor) have a commercial grade fuel-less energy
> producing
> device (requiring new physics), would you going to contact
> a large US company who having some relations with govt and also making lot
> of
> future investments (including on green energy) like Google?
>
> Actually a device working based on totally unknown phenomenon should not
> be consumer product at the first hand, all step for commercializing such a
> product will have serious difficulties.
>
> I think the acceptance problem can be reduced to predictability of the
> future. Breakthroughs in physics and technologies change the World.
> Sometimes it could be possible to introduce these innovations without
> loosing
> capability to predict the future. So a large organization could be
> advantageous to determine the way of realization of the breakthrough for
> this reason...
>
> Hamdi
>
>
>

Reply via email to