Hey Hamdi, Long time. I am re-interested in a coil that you reported generating Ozone at low voltages.
Can you give some more detail on that one please? Thanks, John On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Hamdi Ucar <u...@verisoft.com> wrote: > Hello everybody remembering me, > > I had difficulty to join Vortex List by a possible reason of > http://www.mail-archive.com is possibly being filtered here. Terry helped > me. > > I would like to ask your opinions about suppression (trends) after 2000 > where global CO2 emissions is widely considered a serious issue. It > appears that self-suppression is effective enough, so direct > interventions are no longer needed :) I dont want also blame mainstream > science for lack of interest as long as the they haven't the phenomenon > in their hands. > > For example if you (inventor) have a commercial grade fuel-less energy > producing > device (requiring new physics), would you going to contact > a large US company who having some relations with govt and also making lot > of > future investments (including on green energy) like Google? > > Actually a device working based on totally unknown phenomenon should not > be consumer product at the first hand, all step for commercializing such a > product will have serious difficulties. > > I think the acceptance problem can be reduced to predictability of the > future. Breakthroughs in physics and technologies change the World. > Sometimes it could be possible to introduce these innovations without > loosing > capability to predict the future. So a large organization could be > advantageous to determine the way of realization of the breakthrough for > this reason... > > Hamdi > > >
