I agree Jed, you would think that the Celani device should be capable of self sustaining operation with insulation applied if the actual excess power were accurately measured. I worry that the application of the forth order radiation estimation is not working as expected. All of the calibrations that I have performed on the replication device show a very good fit to a quadratic function instead. It is not obvious why this difference exists between the two test systems.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Feb 2, 2013 4:56 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: Have you identifided the difference (or error) in MFMP team's program that leads them to find excess power? I don't they have found excess power in their most recent analyses. Have they? As I have mentioned here before, what bothers me about Celani's own work is his inability to make it self sustain. - Jed
