Jed, I wanted to mention one additional item. Last week I saw the pattern that suggested additional power was being generated but it was small. Most likely less than 1.5 watts was all that I could squeeze out of the shape. I mentioned this to the MFMP gang but did not receive any reply. Of course, I requested information about the exact test that was being conducted and the materials used within the cell. It was important to replicate the measurement under well know conditions to be confident in the results.
I think that the pressure was different than any nearby calibration runs so I requested an additional one that they could verify. I realize they are busy so I am having to wait until more calibration is completed with the right wire and gas before I can repeat my simulation with the required confidence. I am expecting to be able to see excess power if any is generated as the temperature sweeps upwards from a beginning value. Additional power added to the cell by LENR should accelerate the rising outer glass temperature curve. The subtraction of my differential equation solution from the real data will not balance under these conditions. There will be no combination of values that I can optimize which will result in a curve match. If the process is endothermic, that should be demonstrated as well. The slope will suddenly slow down and not balance with my solution. The waiting is killing me since I suspect my system will show what we are looking for. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Jan 3, 2013 5:35 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: On many tests, I find it difficult to detect an indication of the underlying transient curve that is many times greater than the noise surrounding the ideal response. Say again? I don't quite follow your conclusion. Your grammar is a little convoluted in this paragraph. I think you mean that the results follow theory closely and there is no indication of anomalous heat. Right? - Jed
