Seems to me like they could do something like that with a calibration run. Heat with the inactive wire, then put 10watts through the active wire. It should then show up as 10W excess if they leave that power input out of the calculation. Just to demonstrate that the method is working conceptually.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, what I mean is that you could try to make a dummy, a fake data and > input that into the program and see if you can hide a positive, dummy, > signal. > > > 2013/2/7 David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > >> If you are suggesting that there should be LENR activity and thus a >> reading of zero excess power is a false negative, then the program >> demonstrates that. It is my philosophy to let the results speak for >> themselves regardless of the outcome. The program does that by fitting the >> input power variable to the data for the best match. I have no way to >> change this once it has been told to optimize unless I intentionally lock >> its value for other purposes. > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
