Your don't have a theory, ChemE. You have a lot of words and pictures at a blog. No arithmetic. I've asked you for arithmetic repeatedly and you refuse to be forthcoming.
Moreover, you pretend that I said nothing about classified information. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, I thought my theory was strange. > I think our space tracking capabilities for high speed > celestial objects are woefully lacking and we are sitting ducks. We have > civilians with HD video cams that are detecting these objects before the > governments. > > > > On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: > >> OK so I'm going to go way out on a limb here and propose an explanation >> for the "coincidence": >> >> It has been known for decades that asteroidal resources are a potential >> material resource bonanza and also potential kinetic weapons. The fact >> that it has taken until recently for private enterprise to enter the >> picture<http://singularityhub.com/2013/02/19/interview-diamandis-planetary-resources-to-claim-high-value-asteroids-with-robotic-beacons/> >> should >> not blind us to the fact that detailed plans for asteroid husbandry have >> existed for decades and that the spy satellite technology, now being used >> by private asteroid prospecting, as been in use by government agencies for >> decades -- including the military. >> >> We don't need to hypothesis exotic technologies to posit the potential >> "black project" existence of asteroid husbandry technology that has enjoyed >> a decades-long maturation period. The technologies existed, in >> unclassified form, as early as the Apollo program. This is all that is >> necessary to posit the "means" and "opportunity" (not the motive) for an >> artificial "coincidence" between an earth-approaching asteroid and an >> artificially controlled meteor: >> >> If advanced spy satellite technology had been used to do asteroid >> prospecting over the last few decades, it is easy to imagine a much greater >> precision assay of earth approaching asteroids exists in the "black" than >> is known -- or at least admittedly known -- by unclassified sources. This >> provides the "opportunity" in that it may have been known many years, >> possibly decades, in advance that a 50m asteroid was going to pass within >> GSO of Earth on February 15, 2013. >> >> As to means, if a nuclear power plant and/or large solar array were >> placed on an earth-approaching meteoroid of modest mass, simply throwing >> chunks of rock off its surface -- particularly while at apogee -- could >> provide sufficient delta-v over the course of years to direct it to enter >> earth's atmosphere at a low angle of incidence (thereby guaranteeing no >> substantial serious ground effect), and do so in such a way that its entry >> would approximately coincide with the near pass of the asteroid. >> >> Now for the motive: >> >> In intelligence agencies (yes I have had dealings including working in a >> SCIF for months under daily review by the Joint Chiefs and Jasons on an >> 'imminent nuclear war' priority project, so I do know a little) there is >> something called a "signature" which provides a "plausible deniability" >> cover to the mundanes while ensuring the message gets through to the >> opposing side's intelligence agencies. Such a statistical anomaly >> involving potential weaponry fits the bill of a "signature". The message >> is simply this: We have sufficient control of the asteroid's little >> brother that you might be wise to consider the possibility that we have >> control of the asteroid. >> >> Remaining questions regarding the motive (as in means, motive and >> opportunity) are: >> >> Why Russia? >> >> Why now? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A particularly relevant passage for those who get stuck on "clustering" >> of random events (ToE: Theory of Everything): >> >> (R) Random universe. Actually there is a much simpler way of obtaining a >> ToE. Consider an infinite >> sequence of random bits (fair coin tosses). It is easy to see that any >> finite pattern, i.e., any finite >> binary sequence, occurs (actually infinitely often) in this string. Now >> consider our observable universe >> quantized at e.g. Planck level, and code the whole space-time universe >> into a huge bit string. If the >> universe ends in a big crunch, this string is finite. (Think of a digital >> high resolution 3D movie of the >> universe from the big bang to the big crunch). This big string also >> appears somewhere in our random >> string, hence our random string is a perfect ToE. This is reminiscent of >> the Boltzmann brain idea that >> in a sufficiently large random universe, *there exist low entropy regions >> * that resemble our own universe >> and/or brain (observer) [17, Sec.3.8]. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:45 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> All this talk about Pi and monkeys seems not to be really taking hold of >> some minds here at vortex. Let me suggest if you are going to founder on >> the rocks of algorithmic randomness/information/probability theory, you go >> for guidance to the world's foremost authority (IMHO), Marcus Hutter and >> read his relatively accessible "A Complete Theory of Everything (Will Be >> Subjective)" <http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/3/4/329>. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >> Also, if you read pi carefully and far into the future, it will reveal >> all of the events that are to come on Earth and throughout the universe. >> Of course, you might have a bit of trouble eliminating the vast number of >> predictions that are utter non sense. >> >> Now, you might not find the reference to the future events before they >> happen because it may take forever to get the information. Remember, every >> historical event was also there for the reading, but we missed all of them >> as far as I know. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 9:36 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Russian meteor causes blast; hundreds injured >> >> If it is possible that Pi contains a coded version of the complete >> works of Shakesoeare, then is it possible that Pi already contains a >> different coded message, which we will never detect as long as the >> natural language of this different message remains unknown to us? >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I suspect there is an invalid assumption about randomness that we are >> >> making >> when we go along with the old thought experiment of a corps of eternally >> typing >> monkeys eventually producing Shakespeare's folio or imagining that the folio >> can >> be found at some point transcoded in the decimals of Pi. I wonder if there is >> already a mathematical proof out there to the effect that the latter is an >> impossibility. >> > >> > I suspect you are not fully appreciating what endless and non-repetitive >> means. >> > If it never can end and d >> >>
