We await with bated breath your homework. I found your posting a scattershot URL with a bunch of other links to various theories, none of which was anything like the theory I posit, to be typical of your reponses to pointed questions: Evasive.
The only thing that might possibly be construed as related to my theory is this uncited sentence: "Other theories claim the meteorite itself was evidence of a new weapon." and the only possible backup for this sentence is a theory by a lone Russian politician claiming the weapon was _not_ a meteor. Keep it up, ChemE. Pretty soon no one is going to be interested in your trolls. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:25 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hard to do math while driving and texting on my iPhone. > > Glad you liked the theories, the second was similar to yours and grouped > with the Mayans based on its merits. > > > On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: > >> No arithmetic worked out in response to my second challenge. >> >> A scattershot of a bunch "conspiracy" theories starting with a Mayan >> prophesies in response to my second challenge to come up with "a" >> (singular) URL to "a" (singular) "conspiracy" theory more plausible than my >> theory, which is not "conspiratorial" unless you include routine government >> classified work as "conspiratorial". >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Ok, >> >> The object was in a 2 body kepler orbit, formula on my site >> >> The 20' dia perfectly round hole in the lake with no object found was a >> nucleus with a bubble of condensed gas surrounding it. Last I read >> Authorities believe the round hole is a hoax because they cannot explain >> it, although they found fragments around the hole. >> >> The nucleus that struck the lake may have weighed much more than 10k >> tons. Without knowing the orbital path it is impossible to tell. >> >> Your answer: >> >> http://m.popsci.com/science/article/2013-02/best-russian-meteorite-conspiracy-theories >> >> >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> Completing the first part of my second challenge to ChemE for him the URL >> to the relevant arithmetic is (presumably): >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/02/03/number-crunching/ >> >> But you must then search for the subheading: >> >> Typical Particle Orbit Calculations >> >> The second part of my second challenge to ChemE awaits the application of >> these equations to the phenomena of February 15, 2013. >> >> My first challenge to ChemE, defying him to come up with a URL to an >> "internet government conspiracy theory" that is more plausible than mine >> remains unanswered even in part. >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Darkmattersalot.com >> on the menu >> >> My unfalsifiable claim regarding cold fusion is still aliens farting >> through a wormhole, they are just playing with us. >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> The typical "internet government conspiracy theory" has to refer >> technologies that are far from being widely acknowledged to be mundane >> science and/or to programs that involve motives that are far from being >> widely acknowledged as being legitimate. I've made no such assumptions and >> I defy you to come up with a URL to a theory that is more plausible. >> >> On the other hand if you, at long last, have actually come up with >> arithmetic, you might try not only providing a URL instead of merely >> referring to some menu on some website, but applying that arithmetic in an >> explanation of the observe phenomena. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:15 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Actually I have calcs now on the menu on my site. I also show multi-body >> problem formulas and calculations for the core of the Earth. I have also >> been tracking orbits for 2 months and predicting low pressure systems. I >> am building an orbital model through the Google Earth API and fitting it to >> two Hurricane tracks from 2012. Also have a provisional patent filed. >> >> All you have is another government conspiracy theory I can find plastered >> all over the Internet. >> >> I have falsifiable claims, one being that double rainbows with a dark >> band are thermodynamic and pull a vacuum and cool and condense water vapor. >> >> >> On Thursday, February 21, 2013, James Bowery wrote: >> >> Your don't have a theory, ChemE. You have a lot of words and pictures at >> a blog. No arithmetic. I've asked you for arithmetic repeatedly and you >> refuse to be forthcoming. >> >> Moreover, you pretend that I said nothing about classified information. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Wow, I >> >>
