Dear Axil,
It does make for controversy but I think certain lattice
geometries or layers of compressed noble gases can pit stiction forces against
the normally unexploitable random motion of gas loaded between said geometry or
layers... I often use the disassociation threshold of H2 as a convenient
example where the stiction force and changes in stiction levels oppose random
motion of gas and discount the energy needed to disassociate a gas molecule
below the level released when the molecule immediately reforms... But other
exploitations of these quantum forces and gas motion could also explain the
bootstrap for your theory, I am simply convinced that the underlying bootstrap
principle is zero point energy.. a self assembling maxwellian demon/Heisenberg
trap [as long as you prevent stiction from completely collapsing the geometry]
that opposes random motion of gas through the geometry...It isn't the classic
demon separating hot from cold atoms but segregating vacuum pressure into zones
big enough for atoms to occupy IS still a form of maxwellian sorting where
random motion is exploited to fill one zone in preference to the other. I like
Jan Naudts paper on the Hydrino as relativistic hydrogen because it gives EXTRA
strength to the energy available from zero point through time dilation.. in my
example of exploiting the disassociation threshold of gas molecules because the
endless reaction between atomic and molecular state can now occur millions of
time faster from our perspective when it occurs inside a casimir cavity where
the theory for casimir plates opposing longer vacuum wavelengths is exchanged
for a temporal version of the theory where all the wavelengths still fit
between the plates from their local perspective inside the cavity while we see
them as shorter from our perspective through Lorentzian contraction/dilation...
[a tiny TARTUS] the wavelengths are rotated onto the time axis and gas atom
caught in this cavity see the walls shrink away from them such that they can
occupy a volume of space that appears to small from our frame outside the
cavity. This could be the poor mans vehicle for relativistic effects using
segregation of vacuum pressure at the nano scale instead of compression due to
near luminal speeds at the macro.
Regards: Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:It is fission dear fellows; clear your minds of
confusion
Dear Francis,
Your post got me thinking. We may have a chicken or the egg situation here.
The speed of light may well be modified in the nuclear active environment
(NAE). But why?
The first think that passed through my head was how Joe Papp shot large amounts
of current through isotopes to increase the alpha production from radioactive
alpha emitters.
From the ScienceDaily reference as follows:
"They found that a specific property of vacuum called the impedance, which is
crucial to determining the speed of light, depends only on the sum of the
square of the electric charges of particles but not on their masses."
If we increase the charge density in and immediately around the NAE, the speed
of light might well be modified. The increase in the electric charge
concentration might modify the character and the strength of the vacuum, and
therefore the speed of light.
Is it the increase in the charge concentration that lowers the coulomb barrier
or is it the associated change in the speed of light, or is it the modification
of the vacuum impedance that is the active agent.
The Papp engine does concentrate charge in the noble gas clusters without the
presence of a NAE.
The Noble gas cluster provides a different type of NAE.
Where does the increase in energy within a LENR system come from, the vacuum or
the fusion and/or fission that causes transmutation due to a lowered coulomb
barrier?
How can we understand what the ultimate cause of LENR really is and what are
the associated effects?
Cheers: Axil
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Roarty, Francis X
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote:
Axil,
I am totally ok with your description regarding virtual energy exceeding the
columb barrier but less convinced about your conclusion based on lack of
radioactive ash [snip] After this nuclear relaxation process, if the energy
level inside the nucleus has been lowed enough so that it can never again
surmount the coulomb barrier no matter how much virtual energy may appear, the
element is said to be stable. [/snip] IMHO the material really is radioactive
from "our" perspective while the material is inside the NAE.. the geometry is
segregating the vacuum density and producing anomalous decay rates from our
perspective... time dilation.. while from it's own local perspective the decay
rate may appear to be millions of years.... see "speed of light may not be
fixed" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130325111154.htm .. There
have been some anomalous half life reports on radioactive gas decay when loaded
into an NAE both accelerated and even some decelerated which is why I posit the
geometry allows for a balanced segregation effect and it is the flow path that
exposes the gas molecules to the environment in a manner that can unbalance the
time metric in favor of one of the segregated areas over the other. The gas on
average spends, for instance, more time in an area where virtual particles are
suppressed inside a cavity vs compressed outside the cavity.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 7:17 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:It is fission dear fellows; clear your minds of
confusion
The Bumpy Road.
The binding energy contained inside the nucleus is an uncertain thing; it goes
up and down at the whim of quantum mechanics; it varies with the uncertainty
principle. This energy is comprised of two parts: a real energy and a virtual
energy. It is this virtual energy that can vary widely and is not constrained
by the laws of energy and momentum.
When constrained inside the nucleus and when this nuclear energy is composed of
these two parts get strong enough, it spills over the top of the coulomb
barrier and forms a real particle outside the nucleus. This is quantum
mechanical tunneling. The virtual part of this spillover energy only lasts for
the briefest of instants and immediately goes away and only the real part
remains to congeal into the newly radiated particle that has tunneled through
the barrier. This process is called radioactive decay (AKA tunneling through
the coulomb barrier).
After this nuclear relaxation process, if the energy level inside the nucleus
has been lowed enough so that it can never again surmount the coulomb barrier
no matter how much virtual energy may appear, the element is said to be stable.
In regards to LENR, we can draw and amazing and informative conclusion from
this behavior of the nuclear reaction.
The fact that no radioactive isotopes are found in the ash of the cold fusion
reaction is unequivocal proof that LENR is caused by the lowering of the
coulomb barrier and NOT a fusion process. That is, when the coulomb barrier is
very low during the LENR moment, the energy in the nucleus is stabilized at the
lowest barrier level in relation to the lowered coulomb barrier. Now when the
barrier neutralization is removed and the barrier springs back to full power,
the binding energy contained in the newly formed nucleus is completely relaxed
in regards to the newly recovered strength of the coulomb barrier.
Here is an analog from the real world to explain this principle.
If you take a glass of water filled to the brim on a car trip over a bumpy
road, the water will splash over the brim until water reaches a maximum level
to where the water does not slash anymore.
Now suppose you could magically reduce the sides of the glass to a low level
when the bumpy trip first starts and the water level reaches this maximum no
spill level, now you magically raise the sides of the glass very high again. No
water will ever spill out no matter how bumpy the road gets. The water level in
the glass is now forever stable.
The nuclear binding energy excess produced by the LENR reaction is spread
around the lattice to all the other members of the Bose-Einstein condensate, so
both the new nucleus and the expelled particle(s) have little excess energy to
dissipate into the localized lattice. These nuclear fragments part ways at a
very slow pace with little disruptions on the other NAE around them.
This is why a LENR reactor that contains a Lattice characterized by a
Bose-Einstein condensate can operate for a lone tine: the nuclear energy that
is released by the LENR reaction is delocalized throughout the lattice and the
expelled particles have little energy to damage the area close to the NAE. The
NAEs remain intact and the LENR reaction can repeat many times.
When a condensate is not present, the LENR energy is localized and the lattice
is destroyed. The LENR reaction will quickly stop as all the NAEs are cratered.
Cheers: Axil
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:19 PM,
<mix...@bigpond.com<mailto:mix...@bigpond.com>> wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:03:34 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>You are right. They are in superposition. They are nowhere and everywhere
>at the same time: delocalized.
>
>This is why LENR gammas get thermalized. A fission reaction in a condensate
>will spread its energy throughout the condensate,
Most of the energy of a fission reaction is usually carried by the particles.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
