I think what people are saying: The concept of science works but the
application frequently sucks! The Scientific method is a guide, like
the Ten Commandments, but is likewise frequently ignored.
Nevertheless, the idea works and provides an incentive for people who
need a guide.
Ed Storms
On May 2, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Yes, eventually it works, but what works actually is the Science of
tomorrow
not the Science with which we start
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Alain Sepeda
<alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote:
after reading Thomas Kuhn, Nassim Nicholas taleb, Wade&Broad, Roland
Benabou, and after some experience in the backcourt of democracy and
Science, you know that it is a myth...
anyway, with hurts and delays it finally works... with some bloody
revolution regularly.
2013/5/2 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>
it seems we have to re-define some basic concepts
The author (who, if I remember well, has supported the idea of Cold
Fusion,
writes here about our dear Scientific Method:
There is no Scientific
Method: http://bigthink.com/in-their-own-words/there-is-no-scientific-method
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
