You definitely should drop any reference to powerful lasers. Can you imagine the liability that Rossi would face when reflections or direct path radiation caused serious injuries? This is far outside the realm of reality.
The input questions are much more relevant, and I suspect that they can be set aside with the proper scrutiny. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Andrew <andrew...@att.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 9:27 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Hey, I admit that's a bit far out. But lasers can be straightforwardly coerced into producing something that's not a spot, you know. If there's foul play, my money is on the input side, frankly. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: David Roberson To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem And, of course, the reason that they misread the instruments was that they were all blinded by the high power IR. Give me a break. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 6:52 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi Hot Cat paper is a gem Mr. Gibbs, welcome to our world. Andrew, infrared lasers? Really. Okay, somehow these scientists missed the hidden CO2 laser which would create spot heating of the test device. :-)
