For misunderstanding the context, my apologies. The Rossi stuff has the
potential for generating frustration too.
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 2:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:My evaluation of the Rossi test
Hi,
We were picking up an ongoing thread concerning whether fast particles are
being generated in any quantity in an Ni/H cold fusion reaction. (We've been
debating it for several months now, I think.) We were proceeding on the
assumption that Ni/H is real. Then I inadvertently mixed in Pd/D.
We hijacked the thread about the testing of Rossi's E-Cat to talk about Ni/H
in general (and an explanation for Ni/H). We did not intend to imply much if
anything about the E-Cat test. My apologies for any confusion. That kind of
thing happens here a lot and can make it hard to follow the threads. We try to
spin off new threads when it happens, but I never do.
Eric
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote:
What's relevant here is not
- the nuclear details
- whether the output power is adequate (it is, by an apparent factor of 10
at minimum)
but rather
- whether the input power was measured correctly.
Just my $0.02, Andrew
