Hi, We were picking up an ongoing thread concerning whether fast particles are being generated in any quantity in an Ni/H cold fusion reaction. (We've been debating it for several months now, I think.) We were proceeding on the assumption that Ni/H is real. Then I inadvertently mixed in Pd/D.
We hijacked the thread about the testing of Rossi's E-Cat to talk about Ni/H in general (and an explanation for Ni/H). We did not intend to imply much if anything about the E-Cat test. My apologies for any confusion. That kind of thing happens here a lot and can make it hard to follow the threads. We try to spin off new threads when it happens, but I never do. Eric On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Andrew <andrew...@att.net> wrote: ** > What's relevant here is not > - the nuclear details > - whether the output power is adequate (it is, by an apparent factor of 10 > at minimum) > but rather > - whether the input power was measured correctly. > > Just my $0.02, Andrew >
