I wrote:
> But anyone in his right mind who looks at all of the experimental evidence > for LENR will be convinced. I mean the totality of the evidence, as Mallove called it. People such as Cude deny that there is such a thing as a totality of evidence. They do not believe in the concept of supporting evidence. They say the tritium has nothing to do with excess heat and neither of them has any connection to the helium. They selectively deny one piece of evidence at a time, slicing the problem into many bite-sized portions so they can raise imaginary objections to one fact a time. This is an unscientific approach. - Jed