What is nonsense here is the idea that Defkalion came up with a technology independent of Rossi. It seems the plausibilities are that Defkalion has:
- nothing because Rossi has nothing. - nothing because their attempt to replicate Rossi was a failure. - something because their attempt to replicate Rossi succeeded. Now given the plausibility that they succeeded, it may also be plausible that they improved on Rossi, but let's not kid ourselves about Defkalion being the only company in the world to have a product coming on the market to compete with Rossi coinciding with being the first company to have had a manufacturing contract with Rossi. On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vorl Bek <vorl....@antichef.com> wrote: > > >> No crazy "apply more heat to make it stop" nonsense. >> > > Why is this nonsense? > > - Jed > >
