Like gravity, the EMF can accumulate strength by a linier addition of unlimited charge. Where a black hole will form as mass reaches a critical limit, so too is it with EMF accumulation.
In a system where a polariton condensate can be pumped to accumulate EMF in a dark mode, that is, directing the pumped power inward into nano-cavities without loss, the EMF can increase to extreme limits to such an extent that the strong force is disrupted inside the nucleus of atoms close to these cavities. The nuclei of atoms farther removed from the site of EMF accumulation will still undergo disruption but at a reduced level whose strength of disruption is proportional to the distanced removed from the location of EMF charge concentration. On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Roger B <rogerbi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in > psychology, a B.A. in philosophy, and an A.S. in electronics technology. > I am, however, a philosophical savant. > > I have a question that I have asked several times but have never gotten an > answer. By what means do conventional physicist probe and understand the > innards of the atom? What is the minimum speed of the particles that > they shoot into the atom to see what is there? Do they ever use some > version of light to understand the innards of the atom? > > If, as I suppose, and I could be wrong, all of the particles "shot" into > the atom are traveling close to the speed of light, then could not there be > some unknown characteristic at this speed, perhaps as yet unknown to us, > that causes things inside the atom to behave differently than from how > they would behave if the probing particle were going much slower. For > example, what if the almost light speed particle had a bow wave in front > of it as it flew through the aether? If every single particle that was > used to probe the inside of the atom were traveling at .99 the speed of > light, then this "distortion" would be the same in every experiment, and > one aspect of this limited view inside the atom we might call the > "Coulomb Barrier". > > Is this all possible? Or am I off base? > > > Roger Bird > Colorado >
