The Genie sounds like LENR after it's been accepted: 1. Our experiments are repeatable. 2. Our experiments have been replicated by others. 3. Our experiments provide direct evidence that nuclear reactions are involved including the production of high-energy neutrons. Although our experimental results are not predicted by current nuclear physics theories, *the results are real*.
http://globalenergycorporation.net/Tech.aspx On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > ** ** > > Curious detail in all of this Navy-gravy is worth a quick mention … since > we are all concerned about getting LENR to market quickly… **** > > ** ** > > Who would have expected that Guam, of all places, would be benefiting from > this breakthrough power source? Well … Navy Base Quam and an associated > airfield are strategic locations for USN - and it is doubtful that there > are adequate coconut hulls to supply all the energy needs: **** > > ** ** > > http://www.mvguam.com/local/news/22144-clean-nuclear-power-eyed.html**** > > ** ** > > Kinda reminds vorticians of those contracts for grid power that BLP signed > with various New Mexico Utility providers four years ago … for Mills’ > breakthrough power source… should I say: previous breakthrough power > source? (the one following the Capstone breakthrough and preceding CIHT > breakthrough, cough, cough)**** > > ** ** > > Wonder how BLP is progressing with those highly publicized contracts, and > how much lower the electric rates are in NM these days? After all, did not > Randy say he could make electricity for one cent per kWhr?**** > > ** ** > > Well geeze … the guy is still a veritable genius in my book, but he is > more untrustworthy with his predictions than Rossi … or all the Hot Fusion > advocates … oops … no, sorry… no one on this planet is more untrustworthy > with predictions than the Hot Fusion establishment .**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jones Beene **** > > ** ** > > Curious, that the Navy cites Mitchell Swartz’s applications (and Arata) as > prior art – all of which have NOT been granted, and the Navy does NOT > mention the one which they flagrantly copy. We need a massive overhaul of > USPTO due to extreme incompetence.**** > > ** ** > > US Navy or not … this patent seems to be “borrowing” the prior art of the > Cincinnati group: “Pressurized electro-hydraulic processing” – It is a bit > irksome that the military gets a free ride from USPTO in many cases such as > this. The Cincinnati process remediated (transmuted) thorium in an > electrochemical process but they gave up trying to fight the patent office. > **** > > > US 20030201167 A1**** > > http://www.google.com/patents/US20030201167**** > > ** ** > > It is no wonder that Mitchell is bitter over his treatment by USPTO -- > when several recent WPO patents have been granted which clearly mention > LENR and would have been invalidated, had Mitchell’s prior applications > been granted, as they should have been.**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil **** > > ** ** > > > https://www.google.com/patents/US8419919?dq=11/859,499&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A5rfUe70HMen4AO3yIFw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA > **** > > **** > > This U.S. Navy patent transmutes radioactive elements into less harmful > elements through a benign low energy nuclear reaction process. The patent > was granted April 16, 2013 for a device and method that shortens the > half-life of radioactive materials by increasing their rate of emissions.* > *** > > **** > > “Method and Apparatus for Generating Particles,” the content of which is > fully incorporated by reference herein.**** > > **** > > BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION **** > > **** > > The embodiments of the invention relate generally to the field of > electrochemistry.**** > > **** > > Generated particles may be captured by other nuclei to create new > elements, to remediate nuclear waste, to treat cancerous tumors, or to > create strategic materials.**** > > **** >
