Unlike nickel, the depletion of Palladium seems to be relatively constant across the various isotopes with only the middle weight isotopes slightly favored in the increased rates of depletion.
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>wrote: > Thanks Axil,**** > > ** ** > > I do understand what you explained well. But what makes the theory > valuable? How do they explain the difference between isotopes? What does > make the value 86.13% in page 30 special? They play with Depletion Rates > per Isotope, as they want, to fit the arbitrary 86.13%. Or is it something > that is not well explained that enlighten the whole thing?**** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* samedi 10 août 2013 23:17 > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Norman D. Cook @ ICCF18: Isotope shifts in LENR**** > > ** ** > > *I don’t understand how the depletion mechanism works.***** > > Fission preferentially occurs in one isotope over the others. This isotope > is depleted in relation to the others.**** > > For example, Ni58 undergoes fission more often than do NI60, Ni61, Ni62, > and Ni64.**** > > In slide titled "Nickel Transmutation SUS304 alloy: 8% Nickel, 18% > Chromium, 74% Iron …used in a high-temperature alloy+H20 > Hydrogen-generating system", this slide shows as follows: **** > > > Ni58 drops as a percentage from 68% to 42% in nickel isotope abundance. > This means that Ni58 fissions into lighter elements more than the other > nickel isotopes.**** > > ** ** > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be> > wrote:**** > > I’ve read the slides. I don’t understand how the depletion mechanism > works. In other words, what makes this theory valuable? Everyone could give > the depletion rate for each isotope that matches the experimental values. > There is no discovery here. So there is something I’ve not understood.**** > > **** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Teslaalset [mailto:robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* samedi 10 août 2013 18:37 > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* [Vo]:Norman D. Cook @ ICCF18: Isotope shifts in LENR**** > > **** > > IInteresting analysis of LENR experiments by Norman D. Cook and Valerio > Dallacasa, presented at ICCF 18. Shifts in isotopic percentages in LENR > 'fuels'. **** > > It has some interesting hooks with Rossi's claim on Ni62 being essencial > and Defkalion menitioning that Ni61 does not participate in Ni-H LENR > reactions. > > > https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36817/SimulationNuclearTransmutationPresentation.pdf?sequence=2<http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmospace%2Eumsystem%2Eedu%2Fxmlui%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F10355%2F36817%2FSimulationNuclearTransmutationPresentation%2Epdf%3Fsequence%3D2&urlhash=D4f0&_t=tracking_anet> > **** > > **** > > Norman D. Cook is author of the book "Models of the Atomic Nucleus", > published by Springer**** > > ** ** >
