Why bother with the flow rate to the outside? It would not change the measured energy.
2013/8/12 David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > They checked the metered flow rate in the input side, but did not capture > and measure the water exiting the demonstration when steam was being > generated. I wish this had been done at least on one occasion. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: DJ Cravens <djcrav...@hotmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 3:18 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:just published -with permission- a paper about DEFKALION > > did they check the flow while it was under steam pressure? I worry > that since they are using water mains, there could be back pressure from > the steam that slowed the flow. I haven't heard this discussed, but then > I have been away. > > D2 > > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:10:31 -0300 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:just published -with permission- a paper about DEFKALION > From: danieldi...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > > But they did demonstrate it was correct. If you doubt that. You can > doubt anything. > > 2013/8/12 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > > Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I suppose they did not need to include that enthalpy in the computation > shown on the screen, but they should have demonstrated that the outlet > temperature was correct and the flow rate was correct, as I described in my > "Suggestions for a more effective demonstration." These are key parameters. > They need to be confirmed. > > - Jed > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
