Hello Dave
Lower energy hydrino can accept energy from another hydrino which is in a
higher fractional quantum state. So they switch the quantum state. Collision of
atomic H with the catalyst who has first accepted (ionisation and kinetic)
energy from atomic H and produced the lower energy hydrino can probably also
switch energy. If this occurs depends on the timeframe between the original
energytransfer and the second collision. If inbetween energy is lost to other
atoms/molecules in the environment the proces is probably not reversible, bcs
there is no match for energy transfer.
Interesting is that energy transfer can also occur in a 3 body reaction. When 3
atomic H atoms collide ( lower probability) 2 H atoms accept 2x 13.6 eV and the
third H atom goes into a fractional quantum state. I think the proces will
result in net energy release bcs at moderate temperatures the proces produces
more and more H in a fractional quantum state. With increasing temperature the
reaction will probably be less effective in producing lower energy hydrino.
I think the hydrino producing proces is common in nature but only if atomic
hydrogen present and a catalyst. On earth there is virtually no atomic H
present, so there are only minute quantities of hydrino componds in the
environment. In space atomic hydrogen is abundant. Collision with a catalyst
(He+) will probably result in large quantities of H in a fractional quantum
state. It would be not surprising that the corona of the sun is the result of
this energy transfer.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re:
Have you determined whether or not this is a reversible process? How often
does the lower energy hydrino accept energy from a catalyst that has not yet
released the same amount of energy in the form of radiation? It is common for
energy to be traded in both directions according to thermodynamic laws.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: P.J van Noorden <pjvannoor...@caiway.nl>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sat, Nov 30, 2013 5:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re:
Collision of atomic hydrogen with a element or compound (called a catalyst)
that can accept n times 27.2 eV ( 2 times the ionistaion energy of hydrogen)
destabilises the electron, which falls to a lower fractional quantum level,
thereby releasing energy.
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re:
According to Mill theory, what causes the electron/hydrino to enter the
fractional charge state?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:08 PM, P.J van Noorden <pjvannoor...@caiway.nl>
wrote:
Hello Steven,
There have been validation reports about the working of the CIHT cell and
in the month of december new validation reports will be relased as well as a
press release. I think the main issue is now to prevent the electrodes fro
degrading and to increase the surface density
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re:
Hi P.J.
Thanks for the report. I must confess I have not monitored the BLP
website for some time. It would be nice to discover I missed some juicy news.
You mention the fact that -a- 10W C1HT cell has been developed (and
presumably demonstrated?) within BLP's labs. Do you feel fairly confident that
the 10W prototype actually does what BLP claims? If so, there must exist a LOT
of prototypes in various evolutionary stages focusing on out how to get the
engineering to endure high temperatures without degrading. I’m assuming the
C1HT chemistry is highly caustic, particularly at the high temperatures needed.
If this is all true I think BLP is more than capable of succeeding. But
will they be able to make a commercial success out of their efforts? Depends on
how long will it take them to get a product out on the shelves of Wall Mart.
One year? Ten more years? Who knows. We all know there are other competitors
veiling for the same slice of the pie. Humans are a very clever species. When
motivated, such as getting caught in the aphrodisiac of making obscene piles of
money, or something as simple as promises of sexual favors, we monkeys can
accomplish just about anything. Having been blessed with thumbs does help.
Woody Allan was wrong in Sleeper. The thumb should be considered the “second
favorite organ”. (Here’s a little weekend down-time humor.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngizj5FIcjo
You appear to be taking the place of Mike Carrell when it comes to
reporting on the status of BLP's R&D efforts. Again, thanks for the report,
P.J. Hopefully, Mike is listening in. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
From: P.J van Noorden [mailto:pjvannoor...@caiway.nl]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re:
Hello James,
According to BLP the material cost of a CIHT cell of 1kW will cost only
$100.
There are no expensive materials needed.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re:
How much does a 10W cell cost in quantity one?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:36 AM, P.J van Noorden
<pjvannoor...@caiway.nl> wrote:
Hello Steven
Blacklightpower has made a 10W CIHT cell which can produce
electricity from watervapour.
The composition of the electrode is such that the hydrino producing
reaction is facilitated and the electronshifts caused by transition of the
electrons to sub groundstate levels can be used externally like in a battery.
These cells work at high temperature ( few hundred dgrC ) so they must be well
insulated. By using a very good insulation the cell should stay hot, bcs the
reaction will also produce heat. The focus of BLP lies in the construction of
an electrode that can function at such a high temperature for a very long time
without degradation and to scaleup the powerdensity of the reaction in order to
make the cell more compact. To build a system of 1000W would then be relatively
simple by using 100 cells.
Peter v Noorden
----- Original Message ----- From: "OrionWorks - Steven Vincent
Johnson" <orionwo...@charter.net>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 12:42 AM
Subject: [Vo]:
This was recently posted out on the Yahoo group: "Society for
Classical
Physics",
Dr. Mill's Yahoo group:
The recent FAQ under the CIHT topic mentions that "The CIHT cell has
been scaled to 10 W, and a development projection with the achieved
significant increase in surface power density is a 1.5 kW electric
module
that can be ganged accordingly to serve larger power applications." It
also talks about the 1.5kw pre-production prototype expected by the
end
of 2013.
Here we are near the end of 2013 and I have to ask, why aren't we
hearing
about a public demo of the 10W version? It was actually projected for
a
couple of years ago and is apparently working at BLP. We keep hearing
about the scaling up, but as another poster observed earlier, "nothing
to hang your hat on". Whither the 10W demo?
-- Lynn
I'll be curious to find out what Dr. Mills might choose to say on the
matter.
I thought the web site was monitored. I was surprised to see it get
posted.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/newvortex/
