Lot's of decohering/oscillating/collapsing wave functions best I can figure

I like to stick to looking for the big stuff...


On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote:

> Fran and ChemE,
>
> I wish I could add some explanations, but all I can add are more examples
> of (real or apparent?) anomalies and paradoxes seemingly related to
> physical interactions and boundary effects.  Perhaps of interest:
>
> Mystery of neutron-lifetime discrepancy deepens
>
> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/dec/04/mystery-of-neutron-lifetime-discrepancy-deepens
>
> (Oscillating) non-exponential decays of unstable states
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1896
>
> Radioactive Decay Anomaly Finally Explained (Maybe)
> - A long-standing puzzle over periodic oscillations in the decay of some
>   elements may have finally been solved, say physicists
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/view/425731/radioactive-decay-anomaly-finally-explained-maybe/
>
> And, I'm still not convinced that the explanations offered so far really
> account for the fact that chiral molecules, like ammonia, insist on staying
> in either their right-handed (|R>) or left-handed (|L>) states rather than
> decaying to their lowest energy symmetric state (superposition |R>+|L>,
> normalized, of course.)  Somehow, the universe finds the superposition a
> bit abhorrent.
>
> -- Lou Pagnucco
>
>
>
> ChemE wrote:
> > Fran,
> >
> > What I am really trying to say is that if you hang around close to the
> > surface/horizon of  vacuum/black hole/zpe/dark matter (whatever you want
> > to
> > call it) expect more radiation/decay, which ionizes you at a faster rate
> -
> > like catalysis that speeds up reactions that you are describing and I
> > agree
> > with.  If you can protect yourself from the radiation/flux then yes, you
> > will age slower (the surface/shields of your ship will have to protect
> > you...) But I think that is the same on Earth.  If we can protect
> > ourselves
> > from ionizing radiation around us, we will all age slower.  Problem is,
> > our
> > gravitational flux (of entropy to the Earth's center) and due to
> > weather(vacuum) disturbances they are aging all of us at a similar rate
> > over 80 or so obits...and we decay.  Human's half life is around 24 years
> > or so (actually probably less but our bodies replace damaged cells all of
> > the time or we would all be dead quicker).
> >
> > Best way I can explain it.  Trying to separate all of the fusion/fission
> > reactions occurring near the surface of the quantum vacuum "foam" is like
> > separating gnat shit from pepper...:) But it is important and I agree
> with
> > the overall direction of the discussion.  If the core of the Earth, Sun,
> > Gas Giant Planets, ETC. are curled up vacuum orbifolds with decaying
> > firewalls and our weather disturbances are vacuum and that "cosmic
> string"
> > I think was photographed from ISON on Thanksgiving day is vacuum then
> > DUDES, WE ARE THE 5% IMMERSED IN THE 95% QUANTUM VACUUM FOAM made up of
> > vacuum branes and strings all around us.
> >
> > Stewart
> > Darkmattersalot.com
> > [...]
>
>

Reply via email to