Torulf, I think you are philosophizing about an issue that has no relevance. Some politician might agree with you. However, who is going to manufacture, sell and distribute LENR reactors is not decided one iota from the fact that a functional LENR reactor is engineered here or there. Neither does it matter from an economical point of view where the theory is verified. I understand that it would be beneficial in some ways if people who understand the theory was not moved to the back office as the products are implemented. (the scientific acknowledgement would still be there). My two cents to that discussion is to suggest to you guys who have the theoretical knowledge and ideas to make liaisons with entrepreneurs and capital sources that easily will see the benefit. The low hanging fruit. I am not saying that is a must. Just striving for the science acknowledgement might be just as good.
Axil, your say that "LENR may be a new force, a catalyst, and an amplifier for great social change." is always the visionaries point of view. My experience tells me to be much more cynical. Every politician in the world will have promoted LENR and therefore should be renumerated and given impact on the implementation. Lobby . . . . I hope you are right and I am wrong. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:45 AM, <torulf.gr...@bredband.net> wrote: > US may catch up China in the LENR race but then outscore the production > > to China and after some time sell of the technology to them. > > Torulf > > > > On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:14:13 -0500, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > *That will be their problem. It will not stop the people who build > factories.* > > Spoken like an insensitive plutocrat that these words reveal you to be. > But this is how it is all over the world today and the advent of LENR will > unfortunately not affect this attitude in the least. > > > > > > > > > > Like you, a "great princess" once said *"Let them eat cake*”. Many of her > class who shared this same attitude eventually lost their heads as a > consequence; but now again in this modern age; LENR may be a new force, a > catalyst, and an amplifier for great social change. > > > >
