The amount of public exposure and hype that LENR developers undertake is related to fund rising to support business and R&D activity.
This includes demos. Rossi has been quite since he was funded by the NC venture capital fund. Tests correspond with LENR funding drives. I perceive that LENR would prefer to keep a very low or less public profile. Their viability cannot be measured on the basis of tests, only their need for money. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oh, 2 weights, 2 measures! You should, at least, include Rossi in that, >> since you yourself say that he plays this paper. . . . >> > > I disagree. Rossi has been independently confirmed by the people from > ELFORSK, and in other private, unpublished tests. He has also done public > tests. These were marred by sloppy techniques but despite that, they were > more convincing than anything done in public by Defkalion, or by Mills, as > far as I know. > > Mills does have credibility from the early work with nickel, and the > collaborations with NASA and others. > > - Jed >
