What I mean to say is that first Mills is required to explain in total, the double slit experiment including the measurement paradox and then he should move forward from there.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:36:41 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > >http://phys.org/news/2014-01-einstein-wrong.html > > > >Why Einstein will never be wrong > > > >A new theory does not replace a old theory, in improves it. Einstein > >improved the old theory of gravity. But we still use the old theory > because > >it is valid in its own context. > > > >Mills cannot replace the quantum dynamics, he must replace it with an > >improved theory that leads to new insights into the quantum world. The old > >theory of quantum mechanics is still valid its own context, but Mills > >should only add to it. > > > >This is why Heisenberg and quantum mechanics will never be wrong. > > By this logic, Copernicus should only have improved on the theory of > epicycles, > iso completely replacing it. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
