thanks for the advice. I got some contact, and it seems that general advice is that the article of Mark Gibbs represent well the position of Nelson. That the report leaked is correctly representing his position.
More precisely, it is not a definitive conclusion, and more work was needed to confirm. This kind of test is not cheap, and takes few month... There was no follow up of that test. (which mean, either none was done, or done by someone else) so in my personal framework, I can say it is circumstantial evidence, yet not evidence. Elforsk test by Levi&al is more factual, yet it need confirmation to rule out conspiracy theories. Brillouin test are probably better, but not yet published AFAIK. Probably people knowing Mickael McKubre and trust him, can be convinced by his sole statements. From a convinced perspective he is one of the most competent among the testers. From a skeptic perspective he is one of the most deluded among the tester, with vested interest in Brillouin. I have a positive opinion, but no more evidence. --- By the way, off-topic: readers should be careful about having an opinion on strange (apparently nasty, irresponsible, paranoid) behavior of any commercial companies, since there is very strange stories about 3 non-US business being spied. I know 3 independent cases since 6 month. For US business like Brillouin, Lenuco and Rossi, I have no data. Non profit actors are not always clean, and some very serious spies are operating. Troyan horse attack happened, like expert intrusion in building and IT network. Be careful. APS is still denying LENR, but some (private?government?) agencies are aware. Not a joke, not from alien fan. 2014/1/21 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > > From: Alain Sepeda > > The only reasonably solid evidence of defkalion is Nelson > confirming to Gibbs his report, giving positive impression of cooperation > (most important), and some performance (control, low COP). Only > Gibbs/Nelson > give me reason to trust Milan demo as not a total fake... > > Alain, > > You might want to contact Nelson on this point directly by private mail, > especially if that is the deciding factor for you. > > This may change your opinion from "reasonably solid" to "completely > negative." > > I have heard from an associate that Nelson was infuriated that he was > misquoted and that words were put in his mouth. > > AFAIK - he absolutely never agreed that it was a valid test. > > As for total fake, that remains to be seen - but please contact him (since > you post to many groups, and your opinion is valued). > > Jones > > >
