>> > I agree, regrettably. Defkalion is similar. > > >> >> > > Peter said not long ago: >
Just about the BLP's Demo of Jan 28, I want to mention that DGT has presented a 9+ hours demo at ICCF 18 and 2 days before it has officially published A PROTOCOL predicting the paameters and results they will obtain during the demo. See please: DEFKALION'S TEST PROTOCOL FOR PUBLIC DEMO http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/test-protocol-for-public-demo-test-code.html DEFKALION HAS KEPT ITS PROMISE http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/defkalion-has-kept-its-promise.html I think Randy could do the same thing, it demonstrates that he rules the situation and the device. Plus he can explain what he actually has achieved , both in power and in energy. Such a Protocol is necessary, I think. Peter What Defkalion has promised, they have delivered. DGT has not published a " theory of everything": a dogma defining a ideality for a fan base. DGT has been silent and reserved outside of the LENR community, and within that community, they have be part of the give and take. Mills has been in business for two decades and Defkalion has been at it for two years; not much time to disappoint anybody. To support your statement, please compare and contrast Mills vs, Defkalion.
