Hi all, After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom physics, I am pretty amazed.
Folks, his theory is really accurate, and we should not dismiss it just because of the hydrino prediction. He actually calculates the g factor to the same level as QED, but he indicates it took two decades of fiddling with the QED equations to reach that level of accuracy. So the Math is as right as what we can get by using ordinary QED/QM but Mill's math is much more elegant. One hydrino state is predicted by QED too, but the spinnors are not integrable in QED although probably by combining them lead to an acceptable solution. Also the other states may as well be there but it's probably hard to find them because of the convoluted math. Also we should expect that these hydrino states have as well non integrable spinors. The interesting thing to understand now is what paths the QM/Mill's theory allow to go from a normal state to a hydrino state. In a sense it is degenerate and it looks like these states are locked. In a sense atoms must interact strongly e.g. get really close together and act in a precise way in order to mediate the forming of a hydrino. It is not unlikly that the conditions are very special and rarely happens in normal physics/chemistry. In a sense it's crazy how people treat his work all over the intertubes. They say that his results are wacko. It could be that the math is correct but there is a some extra conditions for the solutions to be physical, that is missing that relates to the integrability conditions for the spinors. Also if there any serious issues with his math I would like to know, else he deserves respect, with or without the hydrino. /Stefan
