I agree Mike, and what you say also applies to LENR. The difference is
that BLP has kept the study localized in his company while LENR is the
wild West, where all kinds of crazy claims are being made about what
can be achieved and how the process can be explained. Mills has raised
money to study the basic process while money for LENR goes to making a
working device. I see no hope for LENR as long as this approach is
taken. Meanwhile, I think Mills has actually initiated nuclear
reactions he is keeping secret for obvious reasons.
Ed Storms
On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Mike Carrell wrote:
I do not doubt that when a commercial BLP device emerges, there will
be a firestorm of criticism that may be greater than what followed
the FP Effect. Among others, Underwriters Laboratories will be
involved, and they will demand a full understanding of anything as
radical as BLP. The LENR community can produce modest excess heat
but has not yet compiled a coherent understanding comparable to
Mills’ GUTCP. Nothing of benefit to mankind will happen until a new
energy source is replicated a million fold. Such will require
corporate muscle on a large scale. The first CEO to sign up will be
a brave man. *It is essential that investors and management trust
that BLP can bail them out if things go sour, which is likely* It is
not a game for enthusiasts. Only history will sort out the pieces of
the new reality which is emerging
Mike Carrell
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino
From: Mike Carrell
First, BLP is *chemistry*, dealing with electrons, not nuclei, which
is the province of LENR.
This is Mike’s opinion, and he has followed BLP as long as any of us.
However, it is not fact. Remember that early on, Mills himself
reported tritium.
For many of us - it is illogical to think that similar experiments
done with hydrogen, one done by Mills and another by Piantelli -
will not have similar results; and/or that Mills can magically
ordain that LENR and low level transmutation or tritium will not
happen in circumstance where it is known to happen.
Personally, it is my belief that BLP will eventually be shown to be
“chemistry which precedes and sets the stage for LENR” … aka CANR
and that most of the energy comes from LENR.
Now that cell phones can be equipped as radiation monitors, it will
be almost impossible for Mills to continue to hide the fact that his
devices can produce nuclear reactions, even if the rate is tiny.
Will guards check every cell phone on the 28th?
At some point, when an actual product is near – even industrial
customers (or their liability insurer) will demand to know the
complete truth. The longer BLP waits to come clean with the facts,
the worse will be the repercussions.
I guess you can that this will be when the CIHT hits the fan J
Jones
________________________________________________________________________
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.
