Agreed the important thing is getting enough control of the phenomenon -- at whatever level of economic viability -- that one can conduct controlled experiments to put to the test the infinite variety of confabulated theories to which we have been subjected by the know-it-alls be they in the skeptopath community with their confabulated "experimental errors" or the cold fusion community with their asserted-as-fact physics-babble.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > I agree Mike, and what you say also applies to LENR. The difference is > that BLP has kept the study localized in his company while LENR is the wild > West, where all kinds of crazy claims are being made about what can be > achieved and how the process can be explained. Mills has raised money to > study the basic process while money for LENR goes to making a working > device. I see no hope for LENR as long as this approach is taken. > Meanwhile, I think Mills has actually initiated nuclear reactions he is > keeping secret for obvious reasons. > > Ed Storms > > > > On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Mike Carrell wrote: > > I do not doubt that when a commercial BLP device emerges, there will be a > firestorm of criticism that may be greater than what followed the FP > Effect. Among others, Underwriters Laboratories will be involved, and they > will demand a full understanding of anything as radical as BLP. The LENR > community can produce modest excess heat but has not yet compiled a > coherent understanding comparable to Mills' GUTCP. Nothing of benefit to > mankind will happen until a new energy source is replicated a million fold. > Such will require corporate muscle on a large scale. The first CEO to sign > up will be a brave man. **It is essential that investors and management > trust that BLP can bail them out if things go sour, which is likely** It > is not a game for enthusiasts. Only history will sort out the pieces of the > new reality which is emerging > Mike Carrell > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net <jone...@pacbell.net>] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:21 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino > > > *From:* Mike Carrell > > First, BLP is **chemistry**, dealing with electrons, not nuclei, which is > the province of LENR. > > This is Mike's opinion, and he has followed BLP as long as any of us. > > However, it is not fact. Remember that early on, Mills himself reported > tritium. > > For many of us - it is illogical to think that similar experiments done > with hydrogen, one done by Mills and another by Piantelli - will not have > similar results; and/or that Mills can magically ordain that LENR and low > level transmutation or tritium will not happen in circumstance where it is > known to happen. > > Personally, it is my belief that BLP will eventually be shown to be > "chemistry which precedes and sets the stage for LENR" ... aka CANR and that > most of the energy comes from LENR. > > Now that cell phones can be equipped as radiation monitors, it will be > almost impossible for Mills to continue to hide the fact that his devices > can produce nuclear reactions, even if the rate is tiny. Will guards check > every cell phone on the 28th? > > At some point, when an actual product is near - even industrial customers > (or their liability insurer) will demand to know the complete truth. The > longer BLP waits to come clean with the facts, the worse will be the > repercussions. > > I guess you can that this will be when the CIHT hits the fan J > > Jones > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department. > > >
