more...
a background article as follows: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.03/antigravity_pr.html On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The gravity modification principle explained in the other thread was based > on photons enclosed by a superconductor that are rotating at a rapid rate. > > All these requirements are included in the NiH reactor: widespread > superconductivity, photons at extreme densities and just to cover all the > bases degenerated vacuum and intense magnetic fields. > > Your posit does not include photons imbedded in superconductivity. > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:43 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I would have thought that relative motion to an electric field would >> probably create the observation of a magnetic field, both in SR (that I >> reject) and in an aether model. >> >> But I am starting to question that, I would appreciate any answer to the >> following: >> >> Take a long piece of dowel, apply charges to it's surface either directly >> or with foil segments, making a monopole capacitor. >> >> Because it is long, the field expand outwards decreasing close do the >> distance squared if I am correct, so at 2 meters the electric field is >> almost half that measured at 1 meter. >> >> Now if we set the dowel into rapid rotation, the electric field will be >> moving, very slowly close to the dowel axle and very swiftly out several >> meters. >> At 2 meters the linear velocity of the electric field would be double >> that of the velocity at 1 meter. >> >> So now I ask, IF rotating such an electrically charged dowel (which I >> will propose is infinitely long for calculation) is calculated, how would >> the strength of the observed magnetic field (assuming it exists at all) be >> calculated to fall off? >> >> Because as far as I can see, it wouldn't?! Leading to an infinite width >> magnetic field. >> Of course an added anomaly is that such an electric field would soon >> exceed the speed of light (if you go way out) if possible for it to do so >> if we assume the field keeps on going. >> >> And if it doesn't, then what would happen to the electric field when it >> tries to move too fast? Produce photons? (but certainly not normal ones) >> Would the electric field just disappear? >> >> Am I making a major error in these assumptions anywhere? >> >> John >> > >
