Some study that approach. the problem is laws are designed so crowdfunding is treated like charity, or at best as securities. LENR is not a charity, it is a revolution, the next industrial revolution. It deserve crowd-equities
this is what plain honest capitalism should be, and what it is not today. 2014-03-10 0:47 GMT+01:00 Lawrence de Bivort <ldebiv...@gmail.com>: > Jed, this may seem unconventional, but has a crowd-sourcing approach been > considered? > > I know of at least one scientific program -- small, admittedly -- that is > being crowd-funded. A LENR proposal would appeal more broadly, I think, and > might be able to raise adequate research funding. > > A key might be to structure the proposal with phases, so that funding and > program phases were coordinated, thus building investor confidence. > > Cheers, > Lawry > > > > On Mar 9, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Given your absolutist declaration about "complete lack of funding. Zero >> dollars" you clearly don't consider the approach being taken by MFMP to be >> valid no matter what they do but I disagree. >> > > MFMP has a little money which they provided themselves, plus a little more > from me and others. Not enough to do what needs to be done, I am afraid. > They need an SEM and other expensive toys to do an analysis of the metal > before and after. Without that they are flying blind. > > - Jed > > >
