If you are running a Cravens style simultaneous, colocated control experiment with infinite COP your odds of detecting a tiny temperature difference economically are vastly improved. Basically you just integrate the voltage out of a bimetallic (thermocoupling) wall separating the treated material from the untreated material in a common vessel that provides a small amount of gas communication between the chambers for pressure equalization. This is not an expensive device.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the right > size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right size will > not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or tritium is used to > detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using fewer active > sites. However, these methods have not been used very often, probably > because the tools and skill are not common. > > Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a result, > production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for brief > times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening rather > than a random event. > > Ed Storms > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> >> Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making these at >> the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many different ways, >> but getting the right size is the problem. >> >> Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of crack > sizes? > > >
