On Mar 22, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Consequently, a kit or test is useless unless the material has been made > active. We do not know how Rossi does this. We do not know how Cravens does > this. Until this knowledge is revealed and a material can be treated in a way > to make it active, success will be based on chance. > > I agree. But if someone does figure out how to do it with catalytic converter > technology that will be the Cat's Pajamas. Because the people who make those > cat converters know how to reproduce their work with precision. And because > those things stand up to high heat and rugged conditions for years. It is the > ideal platform for gas loaded cold fusion.
I agree, the present technology for making catalysts would apply and could be used to make large amouns of active material. The challenge is to tell them what to do to the catalyst to make it active. This treatment can be very subtile. For example, the Case catalyst was made from a barrel of coconut charcoal. Once this source of charcoal was lost, new catalyst no longer worked. No one knows why. > > We might be able to persuade Cravens to cooperate in this project. Based on what Cravens has said, he actually has no idea why his material works and could not tell a person how to make active material. If he can tell me how to do this, I can easily make and test such material. Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making these at the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many different ways, but getting the right size is the problem. This problem would be easy to solve once access to the right tools is possible. That access requires money combined with knowledge. That combination has not been achieved. Ed Storms > > - Jed >
