Regarding this post: There is more than one way to skin a cat. LENR active cracks can be produced in more than one way. The way Rossi produces NAE is different than the way Ed Storms produces NAE, and Rossi is far more productive and robust at it.
Rossi produces NAE with his "mouse" which is a nano-particle generator. Nano-particles are attracted to each other and form fractal arrogates. These arrogates are like dust bunnies that you find under the bed. They enclose countless nano-cavities that serve as NAE. Here is pictures of such a fractal abrogate: http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/11/6/063030/Full/nj311113fig1.jpg Note the presence of numerous nano-cavities that develops naturally through electrostatic processes. When these dust bunnies drift onto the 5 micron micro particles, the micro particles use dipole vibration to feed power into these NAE inside the dust bunnies. I deeply regret that Ed Storms cannot comprehend this simple process. It would be better for LENR if he did. ==================================== Here is the reference that describes the EMF forces that Rossi uses to produce dust bunnies: http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/11/6/063030/fulltext/ In general, any process that can increase a dusty plasma will result in LENR when properly utilized (i.e. use with 5 micron nickel micro particles) On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > Perter, what you say is not true based on my understanding. Cracks can be > made stable. However, LENR does have a lifetime problem that will limit the > upper temperature and/or the time before the active material has to > replaced. > > Yes, I know that some people including yourself think PdD and NiH are > different. I have no proof at this time, but I prefer to believe that > Nature does not have more than one mechanism to initiate nuclear reactions > in a material. > > I also can identify the requirements a mechanism must met in order not to > violate accepted natural law and present observations. So far, I see no > reason for PdD and NiH to be different. I'm waiting for someone to look for > deuterium and tritium production in the NiH system and report the result in > a way that can be understood and evaulated. So far, we only have personal > comments. > > Ed Storms > > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > > Dear Ed, > > The most dangerous aspect of the addiction of CF to cracks is that caracks > are destroying the active material, so technologically speaking the crack > theory is a death sentence. It can be true for palladium, but less noble > transition metals are working hopefully in a different way. PdD and NiH are > probably quite different species. > Peter > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> If I had such a method, I would first write a patent. Unfortunately, that >> is the method we are trying to find. I can make cracks anytime I want but >> I can not make the most effective distribution at will, although I get >> lucky sometimes. >> >> Ed Storms >> >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:58 PM, James Bowery wrote: >> >> I may have inadequately expressed what I was looking for: >> >> A technique to generate, in a single sample, a wide and relatively flat >> (very low kurtosis) distribution of crack sizes (and a large number of such >> cracks of course). >> >> This, as opposed to a wide array of techniques, each of which generates >> different but relatively narrow distribution of crack sizes. >> >> Obviously if you have a sensitive detection technique, like tritium with >> scintillation, you would prefer applying a single technique to a single >> sample and getting detectable tritium -- however small. >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >>> I know of no single paper that describes how cracks are formed. However, >>> a huge literature exists that describe how cracks are produced in materials >>> and how this destructive process can be avoided. I have 69 papers in my >>> collection that address this issue. Unless you are prepared to do a lot of >>> study, an answer to your question is not easy to supply. >>> >>> Ed Storms >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:39 PM, James Bowery wrote: >>> >>> Is there a paper describing the technique(s) for generating a wide >>> distribution of crack sizes? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Tritium can not be detected easily using a beta detector. The best way >>>> is to convert the gas to water and measure the tritium using the >>>> scintillation metaod. The allows the sample to be studied over a period of >>>> time by many people if they wish. >>>> >>>> Ed Storms >>>> >>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:02 PM, James Bowery wrote: >>>> >>>> Perhaps I can illustrate by avoiding thermal detection and going with >>>> tritium: >>>> >>>> Since tritium production is inherently time integrated, setting up a >>>> Cravens style dual experiment with a one treated to have a wide range of >>>> crack sizes, and both identical in all other respects, puts the primary >>>> cost constraint on the beta-emission counter. Can such counters be made >>>> economical? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ed, I'm attacking a different problem: Cost. >>>>> >>>>> Since we're in a quasi-Edisonian phase of scientific research, keeping >>>>> the cost per experiment as low as possible seems to be the bottleneck to >>>>> getting a protocol that has reproduces the FPE to any statistically >>>>> significant degree. >>>>> >>>>> Developing a different kind of experimental set up may be the key. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Edmund Storms >>>>> <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> James, I feel much more comfortable using a calorimeter design I can >>>>>> trust and that has been used in the past. The Cravens device is a nice >>>>>> demonstration but it proves nothing. I have made calorimeters that do the >>>>>> job much better and give absolute values for power. No need exists to >>>>>> reinvent. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ed Storms >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:27 PM, James Bowery wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are running a Cravens style simultaneous, colocated control >>>>>> experiment with infinite COP your odds of detecting a tiny temperature >>>>>> difference economically are vastly improved. Basically you just >>>>>> integrate >>>>>> the voltage out of a bimetallic (thermocoupling) wall separating the >>>>>> treated material from the untreated material in a common vessel that >>>>>> provides a small amount of gas communication between the chambers for >>>>>> pressure equalization. This is not an expensive device. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Edmund Storms < >>>>>> stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the >>>>>>> right size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right >>>>>>> size will not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or >>>>>>> tritium >>>>>>> is used to detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using >>>>>>> fewer active sites. However, these methods have not been used very >>>>>>> often, >>>>>>> probably because the tools and skill are not common. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a >>>>>>> result, production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for >>>>>>> brief times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening >>>>>>> rather than a random event. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed Storms >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms < >>>>>>> stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making >>>>>>>> these at the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many >>>>>>>> different ways, but getting the right size is the problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of >>>>>>> crack sizes? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > >
