Yes, a guess but a good guess. Rossi's mouse is stimulating the "Cat" with something that floats on a hydrogen gas current and whose production is controlled through the application of heat.
Rossi solved his control problem by separating dust bunnies production in one unit that has a very low Q and is not subject to run away reaction; independent of a very reactive high Q unit (the Cat) that is essentially supercritical. The Cat just consumes these dust particles vigorously, but this stage cannot produce dust bunnies to cause a positive feedback runaway reaction through a direct thermal connection. It is so obvious and so simple. On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > Axil, how do you know how I produce the NAE. I do not know this and > neither of us knows how Rossi does this. Your guesses are not useful. > > I can comprehend the process you describe. I just do not believe it. Do > you see the difference? > > Ed Storms > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > There is more than one way to skin a cat. LENR active cracks can be > produced in more than one way. The way Rossi produces NAE is different than > the way Ed Storms produces NAE, and Rossi is far more productive and robust > at it. > > > Rossi produces NAE with his "mouse" which is a nano-particle generator. > Nano-particles are attracted to each other and form fractal arrogates. > These arrogates are like dust bunnies that you find under the bed. They > enclose countless nano-cavities that serve as NAE. > > > Here is pictures of such a fractal abrogate: > > > http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/11/6/063030/Full/nj311113fig1.jpg > > > Note the presence of numerous nano-cavities that develops naturally > through electrostatic processes. > > > When these dust bunnies drift onto the 5 micron micro particles, the micro > particles use dipole vibration to feed power into these NAE inside the dust > bunnies. > > > I deeply regret that Ed Storms cannot comprehend this simple process. It > would be better for LENR if he did. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> Bob, temperature is not the source of cracks or have any role in their >> function. Temperature changes the rate at which hydrogen is delivered to >> the crack. It is important to understand the role of each variable. You can >> find an explanation at http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEexplaining.pdf >> . >> >> Ed Storms >> >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Bob Cook wrote: >> >> Ed-- >> >> Engineering resonances associated with any given crack characteristic >> associated with LENR activation may help expand the useful crack >> population. Rossi seems to use temperature as a control. >> >> Bob >> *From:* Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, March 22, 2014 10:46 AM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Cc:* Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:2 Modes of the FPE >> >> Yes, getting a wide variety of sizes is easy. Getting enough of the right >> size in this distribution is the problem. Only a few of the right size will >> not give enough energy to be detected. When radiation or tritium is used to >> detect the occurrence of LENR, the effect can be seen using fewer active >> sites. However, these methods hav e not been used very often, probably >> because the tools and skill are not common. >> >> Cracks either want to grow larger or sinter and disappear. As a result, >> production of LENR is unstable. This makes the effect occur for brief >> times, but not long enough to be sure LENR is actually happening rather >> than a random event. >> >> Ed Stormss >> On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:28 AM, James Bowery wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> Based on my theory, the active material are nano-cracks. Making these >>> at the require size is the challenge. Cracks can be made many different >>> ways, but getting the right size is the problem. >>> >>> Might there be a technique that generates a wide distribution of crack >> sizes? >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
