On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Harry and Jones-- > > You two do what I would call out of the box thinking on this issue--I > wonder where Axil is. More thoughts: > > 1. There have been two different coupling experiments I seen--one where > the balls are fused and the other where the balls are magnetically > coupled. They both represented a connected mostly Fe ferro-magnetic > structure. The rotation clearly creates a rotating magnetic field I > think. It also would cause a certain electric charge to be established in > some pattern on the outer surfaces of the balls at an equal voltage. At > some point or points inside the metal surface the electric field should be > 0. A conduction sphere distributes charge--electrons for example--over its > surface so as to create a null coulomb (electric) field inside the > surface. What happens when there are 2 conducting spheres attached > together is another thing. When you add a magnetic field and some apparent > electric current or megaton currents, you have even a more complex > condition. > > 2. The magnetic field must be rotating with its own rotational energy and > angular momentum/inertia. What is this inertia and how does it add or > subtract from the to the mass rotating inertia? It seems the system must > be coupled by this spinning. It seems there is a collapse of the spin > coupling when the spinning slows. (There was an abrupt stop as noted by > the researcher that demonstrated the fused balls.) > > 3. What happens to the angular momentum of the rolling balls in the > magnetic coupling experiment. It seems to be converted to the angular > momentum of the system of balls once they come together and it seems to > happen pretty fast. The net angular of the two balls as they approach each > other would be essentially 0 since the J vector points in an opposite > direction for each ball. > > 4. A high speed moving picture of this would be interesting and also > something to monitor the change of the magnetic fields with time would be > interesting. How fast are are the field changed? Is there any other way > to investigate the nuclear magnetic conditions in this system of rotating > balls. > > Hurricane balls in slow motion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZwuPyBzp20 > 5. What happens if the balls are gold instead of iron? Or Pd? Or Ni? > > 6. What would happen if once the balls are rotating fast you put another > conducting surface around to modify the magnetic fields. > > This video appears to show the spin rate of hurricane balls can be increased by an electric coil. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5VfGpV6tWI > 7. Is there a coupling to the Earth's magnetic or gravitational field that > happens in steps or macroscopic quantum jumps considering the abrupt > stopping of the rotation. Or is this merely a loss of energy via an abrupt > change in the coeff. of friction? > > I think I have a good science fair project for a grandson. > and for yourself ? ;-) > A little high tech monitoring equipment is all that is necessary. Maybe > NI would be interested in loaning the instruments. A transient change in > the temperature of the ball and the surface upon which they spin would be > nice to know to understand the issue of friction changes. An evacuated > chamber would be warranted to eliminate the issue with loss of energy via > stirring the air around the rotating balls. > > Bob > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Saturday, March 22, 2014 10:56 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Hurricane balls, RAR and high-Q factor > > > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* H Veeder >> >> >> >> ...two steel ball bearings welded together ... are a metaphorical >> cooper-pair, so to speak... raising another weird question: is there >> something about spherical-pairing alone, which is special - at any level? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvq8laPb498 >> >> Nice.... two magnetic balls roll together and their linear motion is >> converted into rotational motion. >> >> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIfTKBVI6ZQ >> >> >> >> Thank, Harry - this video is another good visual example of a larger >> phenomenon involving pairing - since we can better visualize how linear >> motion is converted to rotational naturally. This is somewhat along the >> lines of how Bob Cook wants to fashion the LENR reaction, with the >> conversion of kinetic energy of reactants being spin-coupled, in the end. >> >> >> >> However, IMO - this process does not require actual fusion to be >> anomalously energetic. And coupling would never hide gamma rays, if there >> was a nuclear reaction, so essentially coupling cannot be related to >> permanent fusion, since the energies are too high. >> >> >> > > Suppose the fusion energy which is normally expressed as gamma rays in a > very high temperature plasma environment is divided between rotational > kinetic energy and much lower energy rays in a condensed matter > environment. Since not all the gamma energy would go into rotation the > newly formed nucleus would be stable and the rotational kinetic energy of > the nucleus would heat the lattice by way of its rotating fields. > > > >> However, moderate excess energy - well above chemical but less than >> nuclear, requires only the same basic force which keeps electrons from >> interacting with protons to begin with. That force is the zero point field. >> Puthoff and associates have elegantly framed the details of this kind of >> energy transfer, but until recently, there was doubt that ZPE could be >> easily converted to energy at a macro scale. >> >> >> >> The armchair theorist can imagine that the two balls are protons at a >> distance, and when they are accelerated together, say during the collapse >> of molecule of H2 due to electron degeneracy, Pauli exclusion keeps the two >> from fusing, and yet their linear motion is converted to spin. >> Extraordinary spin such as is the visual effect of the videos. >> >> >> >> In fact, just prior to this happening with protons, the two electrons of >> H2 could have joined into a temporary cooper pair of electrons, which >> function to accelerate the electrons towards each other. Thus one >> cooper-pair starts the LENR reaction and another finishes it, but no >> permanent fusion takes place. The transient electron pairing only needs to >> happen for a femtosecond to set the stage for this form of LENR). >> >> >> >> This model serves to explain, to an large extent, why Ni-H LENR can be so >> robust with no permanent nuclear reaction at all - since all of the >> resultant high spin is coupled back to magnons - which are easier to couple >> within a ferromagnetic lattice than within an exciton. When the exciton is >> ferromagnetic itself, the reaction is boosted and ZPE is converted to >> thermal energy. >> >> >> >> Jones >> >> >> >> One further point about "pairing of spheres" being special or natural or >> favored at many levels of geometry. This goes beyond cooper pairs - to >> cosmology. >> >> >> >> In our solar system, out sun is a single star, and consequently humans >> are misled into thinking that most stars are singlets. >> >> >> >> In fact that is not true - and only about 15% of stars in our galaxy are >> singlets. 85% of stars are found as binary or multiple arrangements. >> >> >> >> http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast122/lectures/lec10.html >> >> >> > > > A stable pair of nucleons or a stable pair of stars both require energy to > pull them apart. > > Harry > >
