Regarding:
many particles convering into a nuclear fusion

Explain the details of this fusion reaction with emphasis on how D becomes
2 H. exclusive of any other nuclear reactions apparent.


On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> An incoming and focused compression wave comes and compresses the H(D)
> into polyhedral shape, when the compressive achieves around 10eV per atom,
> Akito's mechanism kicks in. It shrinks the polyhedra until compton
> wavelength. Less than that and the relativistic effects become dominant.
> Then, there are several possible paths: for D, given its stronger and far
> reaching strong force, it makes the set shrinks. The collision is unlike
> what happens in nature, that is, many particles convering into a nuclear
> fusion, that means that extremely high multipole moments can be achieved,
> that is, the nucleus is extremely deformed, which will create states with
> very small separations. Thus, we have EUV to low-Ray emission, which is
> absorbed within nanometers. Also, for H, the formation may be more
> complicated, it becomes like a mini tokamak, with a very collimated EM
> field which may suck into it a bigger nucleus, like that one of Ni. Again,
> we have the sort of mechanism which subdivides the emission from gamma to
> much shorter wavelengths.
>
> I set one mechanism for H and D, but both may happen, depending on the
> pecularities of the dynamics which I have yet to calculate, I hope.
>
>
> 2014-03-28 21:56 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>:
>
> Ok, explain how these theories produce the results observed in this
>> system, I don't see how. but I am open to a change of mind.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I just pointed out to you Akito Takashi (including those we did
>>> together) and Andrew Meulemberg's papers.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-28 21:43 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Remember Jones Beene said:
>>>>
>>>> "Neutron decay is exothermic, but the stripping reaction itself - where
>>>> the neutron is separated from deuterium involves kinetic energy depletion 
>>>> - *so
>>>> yes, the net reaction is not necessarily gainful unless the kinetic energy
>>>> of the deuteron is supplied in a gainful way, or unless the bond energy is
>>>> depleted - such as in the nanocavity using a mechanism related to Casimir -
>>>> cavity QM or spin coupling."*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>>> danieldi...@gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>

Reply via email to