one possibility is that the increase of the number of molecule and the isotopic change 4->3->2 are not the same phenomenon...
imagine a transmutation from a diatomic gas to a mono-atomic gas... other possibility discussed here is , since it is low pressure, some dissociation dunno if H+ D+ can stay long in the reactor... or maybe simply is the isotopic shift so tiny that even rare survival of dissociated species is enough given all that have been observed before, the interpretation we make of those results looks weird... we need more to confirm... being able to separate D+ from H2, HD from T+, to detect H+, to have more details around n=16-22, is a good research program what is interesting here is that we have transmutation and proven heat. some proven transmutation/neutron generation/gamma production, are suspected to be anticorrelated with heat... Some ideas here are also Hot Fusion, and it is clear that cold fusion is not hot fusion. it is not accelerated particles in the lattice playing pool with the nucleus... It look more like something of low average energy (otherwise we would see high energy ashes), with resonance, intrications, correlation... the kind of funny things people see in material science like semiconductor, superconductors, graphene, nanotech... as someone said, seduction not rape. even fission is not so violent... as far as I understand it looks more like an U235 eating a neutron, feeling sick, and vomiting finally, rather than 8-ball like hot fusion is. 2014-03-30 7:50 GMT+02:00 Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is no indication that any atom larger in mass than deuterium had >> been generated. >> > > See the yellow arrow for species of mass 3 on pp. 38, 39, 41 and 42 of the > slides (according to Chrome): > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/YoshinoHreplicable.pdf > > At first the m=3 species go up. Only after some time do they go down. > > Eric > >