No Jed, I am not worried. :) I just sympathise with you. I do believe your feelings as they are the only ones worth having. However, someone said it is a naive thing to be taken advantage of this way. I think that has some merit. (No, I do not label you naive). I do think that there are two ways of approaching any activity together with any other entity or person. Either you are optimistically and positively working under the auspice that the other party is fair and keep an eye on the response. Or you check everything and require guarantees before engaging in any type of co-operation. To take the chance of a new venture might look naive but I think that is the only way of saying yes to opportunities. I know very few people that want to work with some who needs 100% protection before committing. In my opinion one need to take the opportunity based on 'gut feeling' and then decide the next step based on experience. Being taken advantage is then part of business, not wanted but a price one can and must accept.
BTW I think neither AR or DFK has proven much. I think AR has given good and open reasons in his many meetings with Mats Lewan. I find Mats'es opinion that AR is one hell of a con-artist if this is only a scam. Did DFK steal something? Who knows but that is no significance as it does not prove anything. I am waiting for someone presenting something solidly working and available to purchase. Stealing ideas does not work as it requires to steal the process that lead to the idea and that is very hard. In my opinion both DFK and AR wants. Perhaps they overstep now and then. May the best man win. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > >> I feel sorryfor Jed being screwed of money. Not fair and I agree with >> Jed there is not worth the effort to get them back. >> > Don't worry about it. It was nothing. > > Actually, it was worth the money. The fact that they did not pay, and > then they went on to make ridiculous excuses for not paying, tells me a lot > about the company. In a way, it tells me more than a visit or a close look > at their video presentation would. They gave me proof that they cannot be > trusted. As I said, they are either broke or they are deadbeats. Either way > they are in trouble. > > This is like paying $1,400 to a credit rating company to find out about > Defkalion. An credit rating evaluation usually costs less than that, but in > this case I can be sure the evaluation is correct. > > - Jed > >
