Currently, the rules in the field of cold fusion are what we say they are. I say that Jed's roles are malarkey. I like my rules better.
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lewan might well be writing about the system development processes of > Puss and Boots as far as the "real world" is concerned.. > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The currently excepted position of society is that Cold fusion is an >> invalid non patentable dream or fantasy. You cannot steal information about >> a dream or a fantasy. >> >> >> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Cold fusion replication has no legal standing and is totally subjective >>>> in the mind of the observer. >>>> >>> >>> That makes no difference at all. As I said, you can be sued for stealing >>> a trade secret consisting of marketing plans and advertising jingles, or a >>> movie script. Those are totally subjective and the value of them (if any) >>> cannot be estimated. As long as a company says it is secret, and you steal >>> it, you are guilty. Depending on your method of stealing it, you can face >>> civil or criminal charges. >>> >>> Employees steal advertising plans and other nebulous things like that >>> all the time. They are seldom actually sued. Bankers in the run-up to 2008 >>> were filing lawsuits against employees who quit and set up complicated >>> investment instruments, also known as Financial Weapons of Mass >>> Destruction. The details were trade secrets. Employee contracts typically >>> prevented them from working in banking for 2 years after they left the >>> employ of the bank. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >
