It is irrelevant:
1.  if DGT has the Canadian stock market to deal with or the Greek ditto.
2. if they have an idea (theory or experiment) that at some time will work.
3. if they will sue someone or be sued.
.
.
.100 if xxxxxx
They have been criticized for a year and they have not provided any real
work to show they have anything of value as far as LENR goes.
One does not have to give "the benefit of doubt" forever.
As Axil is saying it is the buyers responsibility to do due diligence and
it is done . Thay failed.
Unfortunately they have caused great harm to the field of LENR.
The likelihood that investors will support new ideas within this area is
cut in half with each fraudulent behavior.
You guys are better mathematicians than I am so you know Rohnert, DGT -  we
need no more.
Let me just meet the objection I will hear; "It is not proven they are
fraudulent"
Unfortunately after a few proven frauds and a few entities with
questionable promises DGT has easily past the limit.

I appreciate (but cannot fully understand) the technical scientific
discussions here. However, the business requirements are
handled with to much lenience. I have said it before but only science is
not going to reach the goal.   The opposite is true
that enough poor business behavior will make it impossible to reach the
scientific/technology goal.

Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros

www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650

“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment
to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why are you sure it was not to sabotage or just see the degree of threat?
>
>
> 2014-05-21 13:29 GMT-03:00 Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>:
>
> I thanks Shell to have funded CNAM for a test in France.
>> for Amoco to have let a skunkwork team test in their garage
>> for ENI/SAIPEM to have sent staff to E-cat conferences, to ILENRS12...
>>
>>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>

Reply via email to