On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
In procurement of systems, it is the buyer's responsibility to do due > diligence: > This argument seems to be a different one than one in which DGT is held to be basically sound but misunderstood. In this line of reasoning, it would seem that DGT are free to do whatever they like, including squirly business practices that approach fraud, and it is up to potential investors to make sure they know what they're getting into. This does not seem like a promising approach to exonerating DGT. Eric
