On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:52 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: I assume that by 10E7 you actually mean 1E7 , i.e. 10 million ;). >
Yes -- it would be nice for my argument if it were 10E7, but really it's 1E7. :) > (However if you include the Ni mass in the energy density calculation and > assume > 1 H/Ni, then you get about 21640 eV / H atom which is beginning to stretch > the > friendship a bit.) > To get a number comparable to the number used in the calculation of the Elforsk team, I think one would have to include some nickel. :) If this is true, I think that means that both you and I suspect that it's beginning to stretch things, and we might want to look for something other than f/H in this particular instance. :) Eric
