Jones-
You mention high spin emitters. What were they?
I would assume that the larger the magnetic field the spin emitters were in,
the greater the emitted energy would be since the difference between the energy
levels of adjacent states would be greater.
Things to consider:
Any quantum system tries to reach a lower energy for any allowed transition to
such a lower state. Thus, the halo concept of the formation of new states
makes sense, since it entails transition from a high energy to a lower energy.
The temperature controls the lowest probable energy state for the Q-system.
If anti parallel spin states of two nearby particles--D particles for
example--occur and the next lowest energy state for the pair is a closer
position with each having additional spin energy, such a transition should
occur.
The total angular momentum of the 2 particles remains 0 or nearly 0--in the
short time that the suggested reaction takes place an imbalance of angular
momentum my be ok--and the loss of mass--energy--is absorbed first in small
increments associated with first an increase of spin energy for each D and then
emitted as a decrease of spin energy as the distance between the particles
becomes less and less, coming to a stop as a ground state He-4 particle. The
mechanism may be much like Cooper paring.
The radiation to look for would be the differential energy between spin states
of the respective D particles as they spiral into the center of the two
particle system and the final He-4 nucleus with its 0 spin state.
The reason that lower energy emissions have not been seen is that such a
reaction has not been studied TMK.
My guess is that it has been studied in secret.
The same thing may happen in the Ni-H system with 2 H going to D and 2 D going
to He collecting electrons along the way or a pair of electrons available in
the magnetic field.
Bob
From: Jones BeeneI
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 9:05 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: David Roberson
In the RF world emissions can be generated by antennas that
are far shorter than the wavelength of the radiation. The efficiency of the
radiator becomes lower as the size decreases but it emits non the less.
Yes of course that is true, but normal antennas are not quantum emitters.
This is why identifying the actual physical data for real radiative emission
spectra is so important. It is why I documented that past reports about UV
and optical emissions from nuclei have been proved to be false.
AFAIK there has been no evidence presented of photon emission of longer
wavelength than about 200 picometers. That value can be well documented in
several high spin emitters; therefore this value can serve as the
presumptive limit for the longest wavelength or lowest energy quanta which
can be emitted by any stationary nucleus – about 6 keV.
Of course, if anyone can document a lower value quanta - in any element –
let’s hear it !
One can maintain, as Robin does, that this wl although it is short - is so
disproportionate with the tiny size of the nucleus (1-4 Fermi dia.) as to
make the large ratio meaningless in antenna theory.
However, experience rules – and if there is found to be no longer wl than
this in physics– then the relative disproportion can be explained possibly
via some higher power law. For instance the square of 137 is an approximate
value for this ratio (should we want to bring in the fine structure
constant).
Jones
