On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:51 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: Kevin, I think you failed to account for CME and sunspot activity being very low.
Elevated sunspot activity is related to aberrant behavior. This will reduce the odds of a sudden reASSesment by Blaze down another 0.013% down to 7.077% ***Well, that's a good point. In addition, there is the spot market price of Preparation H. However, I notice that you're using four significant figures and I'm using three. Your 7.077% would get rounded up and make it 7.08% in my dataset. My data isn't accurate enough to go down as far as you have. Do you have a better data collection scheme? If so, please let us all know. So with your input about sunspots & CMEs, and the Preparation H thing, I am constrained to reduce the odds of a sudden reASSesment by Blaze down to 7.06%. We appear to be very close in our analysis. However, there is little doubt that blaze would take the difference and see it as a reason to downgrade Rossi-Being-Real another 10%.
