*It is not one spectral line Mills is showing, it's a battery that matches theory quite well. Now if we want to be critical consider,*
The observation of the spectral line came first, then the theory was designed to fit that data. If the production of the nanostructures are consistent over time, it could then be said that the theory predicts those lines. It is the lines that made the theory, not the theory that make the lines. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is not one spectral line Mills is showing, it's a battery that matches > theory quite well. Now if we want to be critical consider, > * Is it slightly above noise, was the shown spectral lines a one in a > hundred or even worse spectral capture? > * Is theory predicting hundreds of spectral lines and a suitable subset is > being picked? > > If both of these objections are moot I think that the spectral fingerprint > being the result of a nano structure have no bearing > that would be very very improbable. > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For nanoparticles, localized surface plasmon dipole oscillations can give >> rise to a large range of intense colors of suspensions or sols containing >> the nanoparticles. Nanoparticles and nanowires exhibit strong absorption >> and emission bands in the ultraviolet-visible light regime that are not >> present in the bulk metal. The hydrino spectrum emissions are in the >> ultraviolet. The energy (color) of this absorption differ when the >> light is polarized along or perpendicular to the nanowire. >> >> Certain chemical reactions can produce nano-structures which will emit >> light in the 10nm range. Nano-structures are regularly used to up-shift or >> down shift light to varied wavelengths. >> >> For example, carbon nanotubes can take on any color base on their >> dimensions. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >> stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that >>> if true, it came from some other mysterious process. >>> It match very well with the theoretical lines. It also looks like these >>> fingerprints have been verified by third parties. But I can't find >>> their reports for this at the website, I'm not English speaking, but I >>> got the impressions that at least three 3'd parties stated that >>> the reaction did show evidences of hydrino. So in a sense we need wait >>> for the reports regarding this to see how well they replicated. >>> I personally can't imagine that Mills is faking all this information, >>> therefore i'm quite positive, BLP should now want the hydrino evidences >>> to be replicated so I guess that we should get more and better >>> verification documents later on. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I wrote: >>>> >>>> spectroscopy at Harvard CfA showed evidence (and several possible >>>>> artifacts) of continuum radiation in the 10-30 nm range from low-energy >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>> >>>> There is a further lack of clarity as to the employer of the >>>> spectropists. Were they GEN3 subcontractors with no affiliation to Harvard >>>> CfA who were permitted to use its facilities, perhaps by renting a machine >>>> for a short period of time? The careful wording of the preamble to the >>>> report leaves open a range of possibilities. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
