Linier should read linear.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Both linier and angular momentum are conserved through the emission of > neutrinos as the meson decays to a negative muon. It is this muon that > catalyzes fusion of hydrogen. > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Keep in mind that Rossi claims low energy radiation that could be from >> positron-electron decay. >> Remember both photons carry a spin quanta also with spin transfer. >> Both linear and angular momentum is conserved with a transfer >> of “rest” mass into EM fields of the photons. The transfer of energy >> between magnetic and electric fields at right angles to each other may vary >> well represent a spin and its associated angular momentum for each >> photon. And of course the photons each also carry linear momentum. >> >> Regarding one of Dave’s questions yesterday regarding spin interactions, >> it has been my thought that orbital spin momentum can be changed into >> intrinsic spin angular momentum without any violation of spin >> conservation. The extensive existence of this orbital momentum associated >> with a metal lattice and intense magnetic fields may allow such coupling. >> The change in spin quantum numbers associated with orbital momentum may >> vary well establish vibrations in the lattice and hence linear momentum >> with its classical heat or temperature of the lattice. >> >> Bob >> Sent from Windows Mail >> >> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, August 9, 2014 7:35 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> >> Muon catalyzed fusion could be the enabler of Proton Proton fusion (PP). >> >> The double protons seen in the Piantelli experiments might be due to the >> first steps in the PP fusion chain. PP will exist until there is a positron >> emission to form deuterium. >> >> The PP could then be fused with nickel to form copper via muon fusion. >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Muon catalyzed fusion might come about when a magnetic field creates a >>> muon during proton interaction with a magnetic field from meson production >>> via meson decay. >>> >>> To create this effect, a stream of negative muons, most often created by >>> decaying pions <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion>, is sent to >>> a crystal of hydrogen. The muon may bump the electron from one of the >>> hydrogen isotopes. The muon, 207 times more massive than the electron, >>> effectively shields and reduces the electromagnetic repulsion between two >>> nuclei and draws them much closer into a covalent bond than an electron >>> can. Because the nuclei are so close, the strong nuclear force is able to >>> kick in and bind both nuclei together. >>> >>> They fuse, release the catalytic muon (most of the time), and part of >>> the original mass of both nuclei is released as energetic particles, as >>> with any other type of nuclear fusion. The release of the catalytic >>> muon is critical to continue the reactions. The majority of the muons >>> continue to bond with other hydrogen isotopes and continue fusing nuclei >>> together. >>> >>> However, not all of the muons are recycled: some bond with other debris >>> emitted following the fusion of the nuclei (such as alpha particles and >>> helions <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helion_%28chemistry%29>), removing >>> the muons from the catalytic process. This gradually chokes off the >>> reactions, as there are fewer and fewer muons with which the nuclei may >>> bond. The number of reactions achieved in the lab can be as high as 150 >>> fusions per muon (average). >>> >>> Muons will continue to be produced through energy injection into the >>> protons and neutrons of the atoms within the influence of the magnetic beam. >>> >>> This magnetic based reaction is more probable than the magnetic >>> formation of a quark/gluon plasma since it only requires 100 MeV of energy >>> to produce the muon. >>> >>> Linier and angular momentum is conserved via neutrino production during >>> the decay of the pion to keep all spins zero. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:00 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> OK, so that leaves just about nothing to extract. It would certainly >>>> not be adequate to explain LENR levels of energy we are expecting. So, why >>>> do we hear members of the vortex speaking of variation in the mass of the >>>> proton as being important? >>>> >>>> I have to ask about the measurement technique and how it is possible to >>>> determine the mass to that level of precision. I have never witnessed the >>>> determination of proton mass and plead ignorance to the processes that are >>>> used. Can anyone actually make a physical measurement that is to the >>>> accuracy suggested? Anyone can calculate the number to as many decimal >>>> figures as they desire by using a computer model but the results might not >>>> reflect the real world values. >>>> >>>> Does anyone have first hand experience in making this determination and >>>> what is the real standard deviation of the energy content of a lone >>>> proton? If the numbers are as precise as you are suggesting then why not >>>> put to rest the thought of being able to somehow extract this source of >>>> energy? Jones, I think you might have some input that would be helpful. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> Sent: Sat, Aug 9, 2014 4:45 pm >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:A good analogy for nanomagnetism >>>> >>>> I wrote: >>>> >>>> If this value is accurate, at that precision I believe we have +/- 1 >>>>> 0.21 eV to use for free energy speculation. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry -- +/- 0.21 eV. (I need a personal editor.) >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
